2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does household composition matter? The impact of the Grain for Green Program on rural livelihoods in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
99
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, most economic papers have studied the impact of the policy on rural households' production and food security (Feng et al, 2005;, on peasants' income (Liang et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2010;Yao et al, 2010), on poverty (Uchida et al, 2007) or on labour transfer into off-farm sectors (Démurger and Wan, 2012;Groom et al, 2010;Uchida et al, 2009;Yao et al, 2010). In contrast, the question of the long-run sustainability of the programme has received much less attention, although it is of obvious critical importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most economic papers have studied the impact of the policy on rural households' production and food security (Feng et al, 2005;, on peasants' income (Liang et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2010;Yao et al, 2010), on poverty (Uchida et al, 2007) or on labour transfer into off-farm sectors (Démurger and Wan, 2012;Groom et al, 2010;Uchida et al, 2009;Yao et al, 2010). In contrast, the question of the long-run sustainability of the programme has received much less attention, although it is of obvious critical importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He suggested that environmental damage should be directly compensated to individuals in the adjacent communities [27]. In some large, nationwide ecological projects such as "Grain for Green" in China, the ecological compensation accounts for a small part of peasants' income, usually lower than 17 percent of the total annual income in those regions being deployed by the projects, while the transaction cost across administrative levels are seldom reported [28,29]. This raises some questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological environment of Loess Plateau has been recovered to some extent and lots of steep cultivated lands were restored to vegetation [21][22][23]. However, it is not necessarily true that GFG will benefit all households and improve local rural living conditions [24][25][26]. Besides, there is an urgent concern that farmers get less and less subsidies and possibly reclaimed land if the Grain for Green Project subsidy policy weakens [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Loess Plateau And Agricultural Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%