2020
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does human papillomavirus cause human colorectal cancer? Applying Bradford Hill criteria postulates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(158 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the detected genotypes, we confirmed previous findings on Italian population; accordingly, HPV16 was the most frequent one, followed by HPV18 [ 23 ]. Interestingly, the HPV18 was identified almost exclusively in adenocarcinomatous samples, supporting previous findings that infection of cells with a glandular differentiation may play an important role in the adenocarcinoma development [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the detected genotypes, we confirmed previous findings on Italian population; accordingly, HPV16 was the most frequent one, followed by HPV18 [ 23 ]. Interestingly, the HPV18 was identified almost exclusively in adenocarcinomatous samples, supporting previous findings that infection of cells with a glandular differentiation may play an important role in the adenocarcinoma development [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…So far, a total of three studies, including a single case–control study, have been reported in Italy to demonstrate the relationship between HPV and CRC. They utilised the PCR technique for the detection of HPV using E6, E7 and L1 region-specific primers and identified HPV positivity with varying frequencies ranging from 15.8 to 33.3% in CRC and 8.8% in normal samples [ 23 ]. The variance observed among these studies could be, at least in part, explained by the heterogeneity of the samples, the detection methods, the geographical differences [ 14 16 , 24 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the scientific community acknowledges the multifactorial etiology of obesity, discrepancies persist in the weighting of etiological factors contributing to the rise of this disease [ 22 ]. The inconsistencies could be attributed to the dominant model of causality in epidemiology, the Bradford-Hill model [ [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] ], which, although it identifies the etiological factors, limits the estimation of the type of cause and its weight in the etiology of the disease. In 1976, Rothman [ 27 ] proposed an alternative model that addresses this limitation, bridging the gap between the metaphysical notions of cause and fundamental epidemiological parameters [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%