2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-0031-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Humor Explain Why Relationally Aggressive Adolescents are Popular?

Abstract: The association between relational aggression and popularity during early adolescence is well established. Yet, little is known about why, exactly, relationally aggressive young adolescents are able to achieve and maintain high popular status among peers. The present study investigated the mediating role of humor in the association between relational aggression and popularity during early adolescence. Also considered was whether the association between relational aggression and humor varies according to adoles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bowker and Etkin 2014; McCauley et al 1983; Prerost 1983). Therefore, it would not have been a surprise for this study to show that subjects who enjoy reading cartoons dealing with nasty or morbid contents also show high levels of aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowker and Etkin 2014; McCauley et al 1983; Prerost 1983). Therefore, it would not have been a surprise for this study to show that subjects who enjoy reading cartoons dealing with nasty or morbid contents also show high levels of aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, being able to take the perspective of others (Hawley 2003;Smith and Rose 2011), having a sense of humor (Bowker and Etkin 2014;Rose et al 2011Rose et al , 2016, and acting prosocially by providing help to those who need it Cillessen and Rose 2005) are social skills relevant to success in all domains of peer interaction. Importantly, there is much more overlap between skills needed for friendships and peer acceptance, as compared to the skills needed for friendship and peer perceived popularity.…”
Section: Comparing Peer Status and Friendship As Markers Of Social Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular youth differ from those who are socially preferred in a several ways (Cillessen et al, ). The most important difference is that they display more direct (Andreou, ; LaFontana & Cillessen, ; Ojanen & Findley‐Van Nostrand, ; Rodkin, Farmer, Pearl, & Van Acker, ; Rose, Swenson, & Waller, ), and relational aggression (Bowker & Etkin, ; Cillessen & Borch, ; Ojanen, & Findley‐Van Nostrand, 2014; Rose, Swenson, & Carlson, ). Similar to socially preferred children, popular children appear to have friends (Litwack, Aikins, & Cillessen, ; Rose, Swenson, & Carlson, ) and are high in prosocial behavior (LaFontana & Cillessen, ; Logis, Rodkin, Gest, & Ahn, ; Puckett, Aikins, & Cillessen, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%