2020
DOI: 10.20869/auditf/2020/159/017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Identification with the Firm and Profession Mitigate Outcome Effect on Auditors’ Decisions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anecdotal evidence in prior regulatory body literature indicates auditors' perception of their regulators may sway professional judgments (Daugherty & Tervo, 2010;Dowling et al, 2018;Houston & Stefaniak, 2013;Johnson-Snyder et al, 2022a, 2022bJohnson (Snyder), 2014). Further, auditing experts make many professional decisions while filling monitoring and evaluator roles.…”
Section: Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anecdotal evidence in prior regulatory body literature indicates auditors' perception of their regulators may sway professional judgments (Daugherty & Tervo, 2010;Dowling et al, 2018;Houston & Stefaniak, 2013;Johnson-Snyder et al, 2022a, 2022bJohnson (Snyder), 2014). Further, auditing experts make many professional decisions while filling monitoring and evaluator roles.…”
Section: Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, some research shows that is not always the case. For instance, audit experts' JDM processes are swayed by hindsight bias (Anderson, Jennings, Lowe, & Reckers, 1997;Anderson, Lowe, & Reckers 1993), social identity or professional role (Johnson-Snyder et al, 2022a;Johnson-Snyder & Killingsworth, 2020;, 2014); corporate citizenship performance and corporate social responsibility performance (Azizan & Shailer, 2021;Hickman, Cote, Sanders, & Weber, 2020), information structure (Holt & Loraas, 2021), changes in macro-economic conditions (Awadallah & Elsaid, 2020), audit committee strength and CEO narcissism (Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Emanuels, Gold, & Wallage, 2021), and the regulator's inspections and results (Daugherty & Tervo, 2010;Houston & Stefaniak, 2013;Johnson et al, 2019). However, only parts of prior literature specifically examine auditors' personal perception of their regulator, and none examines its impact on experts' evaluation of another expert's decision.…”
Section: Perception and The Audit Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation