2006
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.6.4.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does incongruence of lexicosemantic and prosodic information cause discernible cognitive conflict?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2007; Ethofer et al. 2006; Friederici and Alter 2004; Mitchell 2006; Mitchell et al. 2007; Schirmer et al.…”
Section: Which Brain Areas Constitute An Emotional Speech and Langmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2007; Ethofer et al. 2006; Friederici and Alter 2004; Mitchell 2006; Mitchell et al. 2007; Schirmer et al.…”
Section: Which Brain Areas Constitute An Emotional Speech and Langmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing an emotional word Stroop task (Schirmer et al. 2004) and an emotional semantic sentence mismatch task (Mitchell 2006; Wittfoth et al. 2010) all authors report activation of the bilateral inferior frontal gyri.…”
Section: An Attempt To Integrate Findings: Modeling Emotional Speementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To attenuate background noise interference, participants listened whilst wearing BOSE Quiet Comfort 2 headphones (BOSE, Gillingham, Kent). Previous versions of this task have been described in Woodruff (2003, 2004) and Mitchell (2006aMitchell ( , 2006b. The sentences were approximately the same length and were of consistent style and format (in the third person, involving a subject and an action).…”
Section: Experimental Paradigms and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempting to inhibit the task-irrelevant cues requires more attentional resources when they conflict with the task-relevant cues than when they match. When decoding prosodic emotion cues, distracting emotion cues from lexico-semantic content also require an increased attentional load (relative to when the lexico-semantic cues match the prosodic cues; Mitchell, 2006a). Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that performing the Stroop test again involves dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but also the anterior cingulate (to which basal ganglia thalamocortical loops also project; MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%