2023
DOI: 10.1111/fire.12373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does informal governance matter to institutional investors? Evidence from social capital

Kershen Huang,
Chenguang Shang

Abstract: We find a positive association between institutional ownership and social capital. The social norms in a region, while not imposed by businesses or laws, play a monitoring role that disciplines managers from self‐serving behaviors. The resulting trustworthiness, through its mitigation of agency problems, drives the investment preferences of institutions. Our subsample analyses based on information asymmetry and financial performance support this inference. Further, the positive association is evident for trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is likely that SA may lead to an improvement in the financial performance of the business and the wealth of the shareholders. Empirical evidence suggests that post-SA, there has been a significant improvement in the performance of the firm (Del Guercio and Hawkins, 1999;Gillan and Starks, 2000;Hartzell and Starks, 2003;Karpoff, 2001;Gillan and Starks, 2007), measured through operating performance (Del Guercio et al, 2008); market reactions and shareholder value (Gillan and Starks, 2007;Huson, 1997;Opler and Sokobin, 1998); and value of the firm . Further, a lack of good governance is perceived to be against the interests of minority shareholders (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997), and hence any evidence of poor governance practices may act as an antecedent to SA.…”
Section: Unfolding Of Shareholder Activism In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is likely that SA may lead to an improvement in the financial performance of the business and the wealth of the shareholders. Empirical evidence suggests that post-SA, there has been a significant improvement in the performance of the firm (Del Guercio and Hawkins, 1999;Gillan and Starks, 2000;Hartzell and Starks, 2003;Karpoff, 2001;Gillan and Starks, 2007), measured through operating performance (Del Guercio et al, 2008); market reactions and shareholder value (Gillan and Starks, 2007;Huson, 1997;Opler and Sokobin, 1998); and value of the firm . Further, a lack of good governance is perceived to be against the interests of minority shareholders (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997), and hence any evidence of poor governance practices may act as an antecedent to SA.…”
Section: Unfolding Of Shareholder Activism In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%