2019
DOI: 10.1177/0003489419878454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Insurance Status Impact Delivery of Care with Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA?

Abstract: Objective: To understand differences in patient demographics, insurance-related treatment delays, and average waiting times for Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Retrospective chart review of all Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) from 2015 to 2018 at a single academic center. Primary outcomes were insurance-related procedure cancellation rate and time from dru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of insurance type on delay to surgical care has been shown for various otolaryngologic surgeries, including upper airway stimulation, 13 adenotonsillectomy, 6 auditory brainstem response testing, 14 cochlear implantation, 15 and head and neck cancer treatment, 16 with publicly insured patients demonstrating higher rates of delay. Patients in our study who were insured by Medicaid at the time of their clinic visits had 40% higher odds of rescheduling the surgery than privately insured patients.…”
Section: Insurance-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of insurance type on delay to surgical care has been shown for various otolaryngologic surgeries, including upper airway stimulation, 13 adenotonsillectomy, 6 auditory brainstem response testing, 14 cochlear implantation, 15 and head and neck cancer treatment, 16 with publicly insured patients demonstrating higher rates of delay. Patients in our study who were insured by Medicaid at the time of their clinic visits had 40% higher odds of rescheduling the surgery than privately insured patients.…”
Section: Insurance-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors resulting in patients not receiving timely diagnosis and treatment have been shown, such as imperfect sleep monitoring equipment, a lack of multidisciplinary sleep diagnosis centers, fewer sleep monitoring beds per capita, and complex medical procedures in hospitals with inconvenient emergency room green paths, a longer waiting time for examination, and insufficient understanding of the OSA for some medical staff [15][16][17][18]. The medical treatment behavior of OSA patients would have been affected by country medical insurance policies, reimbursement modes and proportions of provinces and cities, and coverage of private medical insurance [18][19][20][21][22][23]. For example, the government fully bears the treatment cost of OSA in France, while it only partially reimburses the surgical treatment cost of OSA in China.…”
Section: Time Elapsed Before Diagnosed and Determining Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,25 Studies from the United States also noted shorter waiting periods for upper airway stimulation among Medicare patients compared with privately insured patients. 32 However, insurance denials were more prevalent among certain demographic groups such as females and Medicare patients or those with previous use of oral appliances, impacting treatment decisions. 32,33 Institutional factors also were noted to influence treatment decisions.…”
Section: Sociodemographic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 However, insurance denials were more prevalent among certain demographic groups such as females and Medicare patients or those with previous use of oral appliances, impacting treatment decisions. 32,33 Institutional factors also were noted to influence treatment decisions. For instance, patients diagnosed at US hospitals serving lower income and uninsured patients had reduced referral rate for oral appliance therapy evaluation and were more likely to be lost for follow-up.…”
Section: Sociodemographic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%