2019
DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_257_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does introduction of user fees affect the utilization of cervical cancer screening services in Nigeria?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding agrees with previous evidence highlighting the significant impact of socioeconomic status on the uptake of screening 63,64 . The cost of CCS which ranges from $25 to 30 (₦10 250–₦12 300) could be prohibitive as payment for the service is mostly reliant on out‐of‐pocket spending 30,65 . Considering that the cost of CCS could be up to 41% of the monthly minimum wage (₦30 000), inability to afford screening by FHWs may result from poor remuneration, competing needs, and/or poor coverage of existing health insurance schemes 50 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding agrees with previous evidence highlighting the significant impact of socioeconomic status on the uptake of screening 63,64 . The cost of CCS which ranges from $25 to 30 (₦10 250–₦12 300) could be prohibitive as payment for the service is mostly reliant on out‐of‐pocket spending 30,65 . Considering that the cost of CCS could be up to 41% of the monthly minimum wage (₦30 000), inability to afford screening by FHWs may result from poor remuneration, competing needs, and/or poor coverage of existing health insurance schemes 50 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…63 , 64 The cost of CCS which ranges from $25 to 30 (₦10 250–₦12 300) could be prohibitive as payment for the service is mostly reliant on out‐of‐pocket spending. 30 , 65 Considering that the cost of CCS could be up to 41% of the monthly minimum wage (₦30 000), inability to afford screening by FHWs may result from poor remuneration, competing needs, and/or poor coverage of existing health insurance schemes. 50 Financial constraints may also reflect wider economic issues in a country where more than 50% of the population lives below $2 daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the scale up of CC prevention, these findings inform future efforts in terms of strengthening CC screening services utilization by increasing mass awareness campaign in both periurban and rural settings. In fact, poor conditions in which populations are living impact the success of prevention strategies, as illustrated in Burkina Faso [21] and Nigeria [22]. Therefore, strategies aiming at bringing CC screening closer to women by mitigating geographic and financial barriers in LMICs should be encouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical and ovarian malignancies are the commonly encountered genital tract malignancies in developing countries with cervical cancer being the most common in virtually all developing countries where organized screening programmes are lacking [2,[5][6][7]. A hospital-based study, showed that cervical cancer was the leading cause of death among gynecological cancer patients accounting for over 44% of gynecological mortality [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%