2018
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does introgression of crop alleles into wild and weedy living populations create cryptic in situ germplasm banks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many features associated with domestication are not advantageous in terms of reproduction and survival of following generations lacking human intervention ( Gepts, 2004 ), because the selective pressures by which they have evolved are determined by humans (see categories 1–4 of the classification proposed by Clement, 1999 ). As a result, gene flow between wild relatives and cultivated plants could have negative consequences ( Andersson and de Vicente, 2010 ), however, it could also give rise to in situ reservoirs of domesticated genes for the future ( Ellstrand, 2018 ). Each domesticated cotton plant develops 50% more descendant plants than the wild plants do within their natural distribution, so the ecological-evolutionary consequences of this result will depend on the evolutionary process and the agro-ecological or ecosystem context in which plants are developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many features associated with domestication are not advantageous in terms of reproduction and survival of following generations lacking human intervention ( Gepts, 2004 ), because the selective pressures by which they have evolved are determined by humans (see categories 1–4 of the classification proposed by Clement, 1999 ). As a result, gene flow between wild relatives and cultivated plants could have negative consequences ( Andersson and de Vicente, 2010 ), however, it could also give rise to in situ reservoirs of domesticated genes for the future ( Ellstrand, 2018 ). Each domesticated cotton plant develops 50% more descendant plants than the wild plants do within their natural distribution, so the ecological-evolutionary consequences of this result will depend on the evolutionary process and the agro-ecological or ecosystem context in which plants are developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the factors that mold each part of the wild-to-domesticated complex are different; for example, the conservation of native traditional varieties depends to a great extent on the communities that cultivate them, their management techniques, and interests ( Zhang et al, 2007 ). Hence, the parts of the complex that could be used for crop improvement will depend on the objectives of the new processes of domestication and breeding ( Ellstrand, 2018 ; Mastretta-Yanes et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial communities are clearly an emerging area of interest, with papers examining the genetic basis of host-fungal symbiont interactions, particularly relating to the evolution of host specialization (Gladieux, 2018), and the transcriptomics of biofilms (Veach & Griffiths, 2018). Other Perspectives discussed the predictability of evolutionary genetic changes (Linnen, 2018), the maintenance of diversity because of selection driven by sexual conflict (Meisel, 2018), the value of improved annotation of gene functions by analysing expression responses to environmental conditions (Stanford & Rogers, 2018), gene expression differences in brain tissue from females, territorial and sneaker male peacock blennies (Böhne, 2018) and the potential importance of crop-wild hybrids in weedy populations in maintaining important crop allelic diversity (Ellstrand, 2018).…”
Section: News and Views Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is possible to reveal the consequences and underlying mechanisms of cropto-weed introgression and its evolutionary impact by studying a conspecific weed and its cooccurring crop species. Crop-specific alleles can accumulate in weedy populations by introgression from different crop varieties through time, which may result in genetic differentiation and increased adaptability of the weedy populations [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, the knowledge on how crop-to-weed introgression influences genetic differentiation and diversity of the receipt weedy populations is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%