2017
DOI: 10.1108/apjml-03-2016-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does involvement shapes consumers’ response to product failure?

Abstract: Purpose Customer reaction to failure is of essential importance and varies by level of involvement with products and services. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to use the FCB grid to examine effects of involvement and emotion on failure of products and services. It also explores effects of negative word-of-mouth, consumer advocacy, customer voicing and gender on the so-called silent killers. Design/methodology/approach A 2 (male or female)×4 (high and low involvement, feelings, thinking in FCB grid) betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well documented that product failure results in negative customer reactions (Rea, Wang, and Stoner, 2014; Hamzelu et al , 2017; Umashankar et al , 2016; Lassar et al , 1998). Rea et al (2014) find that a laptop that catches fire has a negative impact on the attitude toward the brand, involvement with the brand, company credibility and purchase intention.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well documented that product failure results in negative customer reactions (Rea, Wang, and Stoner, 2014; Hamzelu et al , 2017; Umashankar et al , 2016; Lassar et al , 1998). Rea et al (2014) find that a laptop that catches fire has a negative impact on the attitude toward the brand, involvement with the brand, company credibility and purchase intention.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in contrast to the “hands-off” approach of manufacturers, our study suggests that manufacturers should be more actively involved in encouraging customers to purchase extended service warranties. This is crucial as product failure is one of the important causes of product dissatisfaction and reduction in brand loyalty, which can potentially impact the customer-based equity of the brand (Hamzelu et al , 2017; Umashankar et al , 2016; Brady et al , 2008). Brand attitudes and beliefs, among other factors, create a network of associations that influence brand knowledge, which builds or diminishes brand equity (Keller, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the area of involvement lacks consistency in its operationalization. Researchers like Amine (1998a), Assael (1998), Chaudhuri (1998), Dick and Basu (1994), Hamzelu et al (2017), Jensen and Hansen (2006) and Kim et al (2008) have considered involvement as a product-dependent concept, classifying the products into low and high-involvement groups. But several others have opined that for any given product category, consumers’ level of involvement will differ (Bloch et al , 2009; Houston and Rothschild, 1978; Lastovicka and Gardner, 1978a; Martin, 1998; Swoboda et al , 2009; Zaichkowsky, 1985).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term disengagement was briefly introduced into the marketing literature by Dwyer et al (1987) who conceptualise it as a dissolution of a buyer-seller relationship, capable of occurring at any time throughout the exchange. Since Dwyer’s (1987) initial discussion, the services marketing literature have mostly ignored disengaged customers who do not display overtly negative cues, but who are emotionally, cognitively and behaviourally “absent” from the relationship (Khuhro et al , 2017; Maslowska et al , 2016; Hamzelu et al , 2017). Yet, research by Chebat et al (2005) suggests that up to two-thirds of dissatisfied customers fall into a disengaged segment, who take no action against a service provider in the wake of service failures.…”
Section: Expanding the Engagement Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customers can refuse to interact with a service by ignoring the provider and becoming emotionally “estranged” from the brand entirely (Khuhro et al , 2017; Quintal et al , 2012). Subsequently, disengaged customers can be “silent killers” who refuse to complain directly to service organisations and instead allow conditions to worsen in a dissatisfactory relationship (Hamzelu et al , 2017).…”
Section: Expanding the Engagement Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%