2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Iris Change Over Time?

Abstract: Iris as a biometric identifier is assumed to be stable over a period of time. However, some researchers have observed that for long time lapse, the genuine match score distribution shifts towards the impostor score distribution and the performance of iris recognition reduces. The main purpose of this study is to determine if the shift in genuine scores can be attributed to aging or not. The experiments are performed on the two publicly available iris aging databases namely, ND-Iris-Template-Aging-2008–2010 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Notre Dame's data there is, due to systematic dilation changes seen in Fig. 1 and likely caused by uncontrolled ambient covariates [4], primarily illumination [1]. As a result, their 'ageing' estimate 3.5 × 10 −5 day −1 is 40 times higher than ours and should be discounted in any discussion of iris permanence.…”
Section: Truncated Datacontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In Notre Dame's data there is, due to systematic dilation changes seen in Fig. 1 and likely caused by uncontrolled ambient covariates [4], primarily illumination [1]. As a result, their 'ageing' estimate 3.5 × 10 −5 day −1 is 40 times higher than ours and should be discounted in any discussion of iris permanence.…”
Section: Truncated Datacontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Eventually, testing different quality measures we can confirm claims in [13] that quality plays a critical role in accuracy. Even the age of the person may be an impacting quality attribute itself, so we tested this impact splitting up the dataset by its average value, 28.13 years.…”
Section: On the Impact Of Quality Predicates On Accuracymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Given that the literature has no agreed view on the significance of ageing effects in iris recognition, it seems reasonable to further investigate reasons for observed deviations in results. Mehrothra et al [13] investigate ageing on ND-Iris-Template-Aging-2008-2010 and ND-TimeLapseIris-2012 databases, and find that the reported increased false rejection rate may apart from pupil dilation also be attributed to other factors, such as occlusion, blur, rotation, illumination, and noise. Moreover Ortiz et al [19] find, that obviously, a high difference in pupillary size and low absolute pupillary values create low HD scores.…”
Section: Iet Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the effect of aging and the other factors that change the iris template, Mehrotra et al [21] also did experiments with the "ND-Iris-TemplateAging-2008-2010" and ND-TimeLapseIris-2012" datasets which are publicly available. For matching, they used VeriEye [23] which is a commercial matcher.…”
Section: Effect Of Template Aging On Iris Based Biometric Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%