“…In general, the studies included in this systematic review demonstrated fair methodological quality. Thirty-six studies were considered to have good methodological quality 25 - 28 , 32 , 34 , 39 , 41 , 42 - 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 54 , 58 , 61 , 62 , 64 , 66 - 68 , 70 , 74 , 77 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 83 , 87 , 88 , 93 and 37 had “regular” quality 24 , 29 - 31 , 33 , 35 - 38 , 40 , 45 , 48 , 51 , 53 , 55 - 57 , 59 , 60 , 63 , 65 , 69 , 71 - 73 , 75 , 76 , 78 , 82 , 84 - 86 , 89 , 90 - 92 , 94 , 95 …”