2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2003.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does learning behavior augment cognitive ability as an indicator of academic achievement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
65
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Exam grades are the most frequently used proxy measure of academic achievement (Richardson et al 2012). Beyond the role of intelligence (Naglieri and Bornstein 2003), learning behaviours are among the most important contributors to academic success in general, and academic achievement specifically (Yen et al 2004). An important reason for examining learning behaviours is that teachers may easily help their students improve these behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exam grades are the most frequently used proxy measure of academic achievement (Richardson et al 2012). Beyond the role of intelligence (Naglieri and Bornstein 2003), learning behaviours are among the most important contributors to academic success in general, and academic achievement specifically (Yen et al 2004). An important reason for examining learning behaviours is that teachers may easily help their students improve these behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used as predictors of school success or academic achievement, current commercial IQ tests represent the industry standard (Freberg, Vandiver, Watkins, & Canivez, 2008;Parker & Benedict, 2002;Sattler, 2001), and the practice of comparing IQ and achievement scores represents one of the most common methods for diagnosing learning disabilities (Yen, Konold, & McDermott, 2004). Critics of commercially available IQ tests (Gould, 1996;Murdoch, 2007) have argued that they include content that is influenced by nonintellectual factors, including but not limited to reading ability, socioeconomic status, test-taking strategies, and cultural familiarity.…”
Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eğitimde zeka değerlendirmesinin ana ortamları genel eğitim ve çoğu zaman buna bağlı olarak özel eğitimdir. Genel eğitim ortamlarında zeka testleri çoğunlukla öğrencide gözlenen öğrenme sorunlarının altında zeka ile ilgili bir sorun olup olmadığını anlama, belirlenen öğrencileri özel eğitim programlarına yönlendirme ve zeka testi sonuçlarının akademik başarıyla ilişkisini saptama amaçlı kullanılmaktadır (Watkins, Lei ve Canivez, 2007;Yen, Konold ve McDermott, 2004). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde okul psikologları bir yılda yaklaşık 1.8 milyon zeka testi uygulamakta, klinik psikologların test uygulamaları da eklendiğinde sayı çok daha artmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified