2012
DOI: 10.18311/sdmimd/2012/2743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Lintner model of dividend payout hold good? An Empirical evidence from BSE SENSEX firms.

Abstract: This study primarily investigates into as to what influenced the dividends payment of BSE constituent companies for the years 2002 through as latest as 2011. The primary model used is that of Lintner (1956) with addition of relevant factors. The study tests three models including Lintner's basic model. While dividends paid is criterion variable in all the models, basic earnings and lagged dividends are predictor variables in the first model (Lintner model, 1956), cash earnings and lagged dividends in the secon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the heteroscedasticity test, the probability value of all independent variables namely capital expenditure, Earnings per share is significant at levels below 5%, Capital expenditure is 0.0022, this shows that the owner of the company considers that there is a relationship between the company's investment opportunities as indicated by the amount of capital expenditure with the company's dividend payout ratio. Its relevance with Parasuraman and Ramudu [1] and Lintner [5] research, determining dividend payments are influenced by net income, debt and capital expenditure and not significance with Lambrecht and Meyrs [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the heteroscedasticity test, the probability value of all independent variables namely capital expenditure, Earnings per share is significant at levels below 5%, Capital expenditure is 0.0022, this shows that the owner of the company considers that there is a relationship between the company's investment opportunities as indicated by the amount of capital expenditure with the company's dividend payout ratio. Its relevance with Parasuraman and Ramudu [1] and Lintner [5] research, determining dividend payments are influenced by net income, debt and capital expenditure and not significance with Lambrecht and Meyrs [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bodla, Karam and Sura with the assumption of the two previous models of Lintner and Brittain said dividend policy was influenced by earnings this year and dividends in the previous year, while depreciation and capital expenditure variables had no effect [7]. Bodla, et al research results are also strengthened by the existence of research from Parasuraman and Ramudu conducted in 2002 to 2011 registered at the BSE constituent, India by using the above modelling, the same results are obtained that dividend policy is influenced by earnings in this and dividends in the previous year while the depreciation and capex variables also have no effect [1]. Lambrecht and Meyrs, discovered a dividend payment model, the determination of dividend payments according to them was influenced by net income, debt and capital expenditure [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, it tests the null hypothesis that all of the regression coefficients are equal to zero. Thus, F-value will range from zero to an arbitrarily large number (Parasuraman et al, 2012). If is rejected based on the F-test or p-values, then there is a presence of Granger-causality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%