2006
DOI: 10.2980/i1195-6860-13-3-293.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does mammalian prey abundance explain forest-edge use by snakes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although shrubs can provide cover for nests, we have shown that shrubs are heavily used by snakes (i.e., C. constrictor) and may contribute to increased predation pressure. Snakes may use shrub habitat because it affords cover and increased structural heterogeneity, which may provide protection from predators (Wilgers and Horne 2007), a favorable thermal environment (Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead 2001a), or higher prey densities (Carfagno et al 2006). Studies in the tropics have shown that snakes are attracted to shrubby edges because of an increased density of small mammals (Heard et al 2004), but studies in temperate regions have not shown the same relationship, possibly due to greater prey diversity or because thermoregulatory needs place a greater constraint on habitat selection (Carfagno et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although shrubs can provide cover for nests, we have shown that shrubs are heavily used by snakes (i.e., C. constrictor) and may contribute to increased predation pressure. Snakes may use shrub habitat because it affords cover and increased structural heterogeneity, which may provide protection from predators (Wilgers and Horne 2007), a favorable thermal environment (Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead 2001a), or higher prey densities (Carfagno et al 2006). Studies in the tropics have shown that snakes are attracted to shrubby edges because of an increased density of small mammals (Heard et al 2004), but studies in temperate regions have not shown the same relationship, possibly due to greater prey diversity or because thermoregulatory needs place a greater constraint on habitat selection (Carfagno et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Ratsnakes are an edge-associated species (Durner and Gates, 1993;BlouinDemers and Weatherhead, 2001a,b;Carfagno et al, 2006) and appear to use edges for the thermoregulatory heterogeneity that they provide (Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead, 2001b;Carfagno et al, 2006). As climate warms, edges may continue to provide thermal refugia for ratsnakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, forest edge extended 15 m into the forest and 15 m out from the forest. We chose 30 m as the definition of edge to be consistent with studies of snake habitat use (e.g., Carfagno et al, 2006). Although wetlands occurred at our study site, they were not used by ratsnakes and were excluded from analyses.…”
Section: Thermal Landscape and Inputsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, for snakes whose prey is locally abundant, there is the opportunity to obtain a better view of their feeding ecology (e.g. Godley 1980;Carfagno et al 2006;Luiselli 2006aLuiselli , 2006b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%