2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis with Subcutaneous Rapid-acting Insulin Reduce the Need for Intensive Care Unit Admission?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most institutions, patients with DKA are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as recommended by the American Diabetes Association (24,25). However, more-recent studies have failed to demonstrate differences in outcome of uncomplicated DKA (i.e., without any precipitating factors except for insulin treatment cessation or new onset of diabetes in a patient without any major comorbidities) managed in the ICU, the general medical ward, or even the emergency department (26). A retrospective cohort study that compared costs in lower versus higher ICU utilization groups among 94 acute care hospitals concluded that hospitals that used ICU care for managing DKA were likely to have moreinvasive procedures and incur higher hospital costs with no difference in mortality (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most institutions, patients with DKA are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as recommended by the American Diabetes Association (24,25). However, more-recent studies have failed to demonstrate differences in outcome of uncomplicated DKA (i.e., without any precipitating factors except for insulin treatment cessation or new onset of diabetes in a patient without any major comorbidities) managed in the ICU, the general medical ward, or even the emergency department (26). A retrospective cohort study that compared costs in lower versus higher ICU utilization groups among 94 acute care hospitals concluded that hospitals that used ICU care for managing DKA were likely to have moreinvasive procedures and incur higher hospital costs with no difference in mortality (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of acute DKA includes restoration of fluid deficits in the first 24 to 36 h, electrolyte replacement and insulin therapy, which is administered slowly to decreased plasma glucose[ 23 , 24 ]. As noted above, a few randomized, open label trials have proved good outcome and non-inferiority for patients who are managed on regular medical/surgical wards while using with rapid acting insulin, aspart or lispro[ 13 , 15 , 17 , 25 - 29 ].…”
Section: Treatment Options In the Ed Or Icumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important and interesting finding of our study was that the mean duration of treatment (20.08 ± 8.00 hrs and 16.36 ± 6.92 hrs; p=0.02) and the amount of insulin administered until resolution of DKA (74.56 ± 37.97 hrs and 59.28 ± 30.05 hrs; p=0.03) were significantly different among the patients of the two groups. Contrastingly, other studies report no statistically significant difference in terms of the amount of insulin infusion and the mean duration of treatment to resolve DKA between the two treatment groups 25,26 . While Razavi et al reported in support of our results, they found that the amount of insulin units required until the resolution of DKA was lower among the patients treated with subcutaneous insulin analog than those treated with regular insulin 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%