Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China

Abstract

Research Summary: Departing from the extant literature, which assumes that firms pursue strong environmental performance as a differentiation strategy, we analyze the general relationship between firms’ competitive strategy and their response to heightened market competition. We find that, using a large sample of Chinese manufacturing firms between 2000 and 2005, intensified market competition has an overall negative impact on firms’ environmental performance. The negative impact is exacerbated in firms adopting a cost‐leadership strategy, but is attenuated in those adopting a differentiation strategy. The results emphasize the importance of including an examination of the particular competitive strategies chosen by firms in seeking to understand the impact of intensified market competition. Managerial Summary: Advocates of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have long argued for the differentiation role of CSR. However, managers may be misguided if the assumed benefits of differentiation critically depend on certain presumptions. In the Chinese context and focusing on the environmental dimension of CSR, our study finds a negative relationship between market competition and corporate environmental performance. It suggests that firms, to a large extent, cannot escape competition via environmental differentiation. Managers should therefore be cautious about the value of strategic investment in CSR as a viable competitive device.

The Response of State‐owned Enterprises to Import Competition: Evidence From Chinese Manufacturing Firms

“…More broadly, just as private firms may need to balance the economic with the social and natural environmental dimensions (Duanmu et al. ), determining how SOEs can effectively balance the often conflicting demands from these dimensions can be a fascinating new ground for research (Peng et al. ).…”

“…In addition, recent studies that use China's WTO accession as an exogenous competitive shock include Duanmu et al. (). In a similar vein, Guadalupe and Wulf () use the same method to examine how the exogenous increase in competition created by the Canada–US Free Trade Agreement of 1989 (FTA) influenced the organizational structure of US firms and their use of incentive pay.…”

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firms’ Innovation in China: The Role of Institutional Support

“…This paper also reveals the fact that social support is not able to strengthen the CSR-Innovation relationship. As Duanmu et al [67] note, implementing CSR may not gain support from stakeholders from the market in developing countries such as China, which is contrary to that in developed countries.…”

“…Social support includes assistance from various stakeholders, such as suppliers, customers, employees, investors, etc. Some studies indicate that customers in developing countries are normally price-sensitive and may not be willing to pay a price premium for products with CSR attributes [67]. However, recent evidence shows that there is a growing number of customers who would be willing to pay a price premium for products with social and environmental attributes [56].…”

Can Environmental Regulation Reduce Labor Costs and Improve Business Performance? Evidence From the Air Quality Index

“…Consequently, it is more difficult for small enterprises to compete with large enterprises, and it is more difficult to create value. Bai et al (12) and Duanmu et al (13) believe that high market integration and market competition are conducive to the development of technology intermediary market, which is conducive to the role of energysaving and emission reduction in technological innovation while improving energy efficiency. Increased utilization may drive business performance.…”