2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-014-9462-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does media freedom improve government effectiveness? A comparative cross-country analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study follows earlier studies (La Porta et al, 1999;Garc ıa-S anchez et al, 2016;Garcia-Sanchez et al, 2013) on proxy government effectiveness using the index developed by the World Bank (Kaufmann et al, 1999). It is a perception-based index which assesses public service quality, civil service quality, independence from political pressures, how creditable government is committed to policies, as well as, the quality of policy and its implementation.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study follows earlier studies (La Porta et al, 1999;Garc ıa-S anchez et al, 2016;Garcia-Sanchez et al, 2013) on proxy government effectiveness using the index developed by the World Bank (Kaufmann et al, 1999). It is a perception-based index which assesses public service quality, civil service quality, independence from political pressures, how creditable government is committed to policies, as well as, the quality of policy and its implementation.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governance literature is yet to have a universal agreement on the measurement of indicators such as effectiveness and quality in performance measurement (Garc ıa-S anchez et al, 2016, Brewer et al, 2007. Effectiveness of government addresses whether public administration carries out its mandate as expected, whether citizens work hard and well, whether the actions of public servants and the procedures of the civil service achieve objectives and overall missions at large (Rainey and Steinbauer, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, the state allows and even actively stimulates social media, such as microblogs and blogs etc, to expose local officials' malpractice from incompetence to corruption before relevant officials are investigated or convicted, often with the idea to build countervailing power against the distortion of information between the central and local authorities [23] .In fact, it can help explain why the central authority tolerates negative news about local levels of government, though local authorities strive to suppress such news [24] . On the other hand, the central government may also use social media to monitor local officials and ensure local governments and their officials act responsibly [25][26] . For instance, some authors argued that media criticism of the local governments would help the central government ensure local compliance and create favorable public opinion by disclosing local recalcitrance before relevant officials are investigated or convicted [27][28] .…”
Section: The Role Of Social Media As Information Channel For the Centmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dong et al indicated the role of social media in the supervision of the government, judiciary, and other public powers; the maintenance of justice and protection of disadvantaged groups; and in attracting the government's attention, urging the government to publicize information and investigate the event, and promoting social management innovation and institutional change [22]. Other authors such as Cuadrado-Ballesteros et al provided a similar viewpoint: social media can improve the government's effectiveness [31]. This means that social media can improve citizens' accessibility to information, which in turn would make it more difficult for politicians and public servants to cover up or hide corrupt behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%