2013
DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2013.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Metacognitive Knowledge About Explanation Moderate the Effect of Explanation Expectancy?

Abstract: Prior studies have investigated whether the expectation that one will explain materials promotes text comprehension during learning. Such research, however, has had inconsistent results, which suggests that the effects of explanation expectancy depend on individual difference factors. In the present study, an experiment with 8th-grade students examined whether their metacognitive knowledge about explanation (elaborative explaining orientation) moderated the effects of explanation expectancy on text comprehensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analyses. Of the 28 studies, 24 studies focused on samples of 18 years and older (e.g., college students, graduate students, young adults), including Chinese learners of Japanese (Xu, , ; Xu & Matsumi, ), and four studies used samples from the elementary school level (Muis et al, ) and the secondary school level (Ehly et al, ; Fukaya, ; Hoogerheide, Loyens, & van Gog, , Experiment 1). These studies included 28 group comparisons (1,283 participants who completed an immediate or delayed test) for a preparing‐to‐teach group versus a control group (see Table ) and 16 group comparisons (751 participants who completed an immediate or delayed test) for teaching with preparing‐to‐teach group versus a control group (see Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analyses. Of the 28 studies, 24 studies focused on samples of 18 years and older (e.g., college students, graduate students, young adults), including Chinese learners of Japanese (Xu, , ; Xu & Matsumi, ), and four studies used samples from the elementary school level (Muis et al, ) and the secondary school level (Ehly et al, ; Fukaya, ; Hoogerheide, Loyens, & van Gog, , Experiment 1). These studies included 28 group comparisons (1,283 participants who completed an immediate or delayed test) for a preparing‐to‐teach group versus a control group (see Table ) and 16 group comparisons (751 participants who completed an immediate or delayed test) for teaching with preparing‐to‐teach group versus a control group (see Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%