2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does microplastic ingestion dramatically decrease the biomass of protozoa grazers? A case study on the marine ciliate Uronema marinum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon biomass of Uronema marinum was reduced after ingestion of polystyrene microplastics (2.14 µm diameter) at high concentrations. At the same time, that effect was not observed at low microplastic concentrations (Zhang et al, 2021). A study by Bulannga and Schmidt (2022) reported that two holotrich ciliates, Paramecium sp., and Tetrahymena sp., ingested microplastics of 2, 5, and 10 μm diameter at the same rate as biological prey of similar size.…”
Section: Ingestion Of Microplastics and Nanoplastics By Ciliated Micr...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The carbon biomass of Uronema marinum was reduced after ingestion of polystyrene microplastics (2.14 µm diameter) at high concentrations. At the same time, that effect was not observed at low microplastic concentrations (Zhang et al, 2021). A study by Bulannga and Schmidt (2022) reported that two holotrich ciliates, Paramecium sp., and Tetrahymena sp., ingested microplastics of 2, 5, and 10 μm diameter at the same rate as biological prey of similar size.…”
Section: Ingestion Of Microplastics and Nanoplastics By Ciliated Micr...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Boenigk and Arndt (2002) reported that Acanthamoeba and heterotrophic nanoflagellates ingested latex beads. In another laboratory study, the population abundance, biomass, and volume of free‐living marine ciliated protozoa Uronema marinum were reported to significantly decrease after exposure to polystyrene (PS) beads (Y. Zhang et al., 2021). However, further studies are needed on MPs’ potential effects on soil protozoa as they play a fundamental role for soil fertility.…”
Section: Effects Of Mps On Soil Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,151,304,[312][313][314] ) predictions is lacking 151,314,315 , specifically: (i) on the effects of microbial biofouling on the buoyancy of individual sub-millimetre microplastics; and (ii) on natural marine biofilm parameters, namely biofilm thickness and density 151 . Further impacts of microbial colonisation on the vertical transport of plastics are related to the ingestion of plastics by macroorganisms 5,316,317 , although micro-eukaryotes, including marine dinoflagellates 91 and ciliates 318 , have also been observed to ingest small microplastics, possibly making microplastics more bioavailable for marine organisms at higher trophic levels 318 .…”
Section: Effects Of Microbe-plastic Interactions On Plastic Buoyancy and Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%