2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03763.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does minimum pricing reduce alcohol consumption? The experience of a Canadian province

Abstract: Increases in minimum prices of alcoholic beverages can substantially reduce alcohol consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
135
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
135
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of switching to spirits from other alcoholic beverages in Denmark in 2004 was modest ). The Finnish tax change affected all alcoholic beverages to a greater or lesser extent, including reducing the price of the cheapest beverage per unit of ethanol, an aspect of pricing increasingly seen as an important influence on rates of problematic drinking (Stockwell, Auld, Zhao, & Martin, 2012). A greater effect on consumption of the Finnish tax change than of the Danish, as in fact occurred, might therefore have been expected.…”
Section: Distinct Policy Interventions In Denmark and Finlandmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The incidence of switching to spirits from other alcoholic beverages in Denmark in 2004 was modest ). The Finnish tax change affected all alcoholic beverages to a greater or lesser extent, including reducing the price of the cheapest beverage per unit of ethanol, an aspect of pricing increasingly seen as an important influence on rates of problematic drinking (Stockwell, Auld, Zhao, & Martin, 2012). A greater effect on consumption of the Finnish tax change than of the Danish, as in fact occurred, might therefore have been expected.…”
Section: Distinct Policy Interventions In Denmark and Finlandmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…25 The Sheffi eld Alcohol Policy Model 17 predicts that an MUP delivers a greater reduction in alcohol-related harm than overall increases in taxation, with almost double the number of deaths prevented. 26 Further evidence for the effectiveness of an MUP comes from long-running natural experiments in Canada, where signifi cant reductions in alcohol consumption followed increases in minimum prices in government liquor stores, despite these outlets representing only a minority of the retail market, 27,28 with a 10% increase in minimum price resulting in a 32% fall in deaths directly attributable to alcohol. 29 as a result, they purchase the cheapest alcohol it is possible to buy, paying less than one-third of the price paid by low-risk drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship has been interpreted to indicate that average consumption causally determines heavy drinking prevalence, possibly through a contagious social environment or "drinking culture." This view is expressed in the continuing interest in alcohol taxes [11], recent interest in minimum pricing of alcohol [30,31], and concern with the increased "affordability" of alcohol beverages over time or across countries [32,33]. However, as explained by Duffy [34], heavy drinkers account for a large proportion of total alcohol consumption, so a statistical relationship between average consumption in a country and the percentage of heavy drinkers should be expected, and does not necessarily imply a causal relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%