Does mixed ownership reform affect private firms’ ESG practices? Evidence from a quasi‐natural experiment in China

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of property rights reform on private firms' environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. ESG investing has become mainstream and a hot topic globally, but it is a black box of corporate ESG practices and performance. Importantly, it is not clear how to specifically enhance private firms' ESG practices.This study addresses this problem by exploring an ideal setting of China's mixed-ownership reform in which private firms acquire equity in state-owned enterprises (SOEs).We examine whether and how this reform affects private acquirer firms' ESG practices. Using a powerful differencein-differences design, we find that mixed-ownership reform significantly enhances private firms' ESG practices through heightened public scrutiny and the privileges of formal financing and government subsidies that are available due to the firms' partial government ownership after mixedownership reform. Our findings have policy implications for promoting ESG practices and SOE reform. Specifically, our empirical evidence indicates that mixed-ownership reform can facilitate sustainable development for both SOEs and private firms.

Can network attention effectively stimulate corporate ESG practices?—Evidence from China

“…However, the intensification of product market competition has a negative impact on ESG in emerging markets [30]. (2) Factors influencing enterprise characteristics: From the perspective of internal characteristics of the enterprise, company size [31], property rights reform [32], controlling shareholder pledging [33], as well as other factors can all improve the ESG score of the enterprise. From the perspective of enterprise strategic positioning, enterprises with strong management orientation will have higher ESG performance [34].…”

The Influence of Board Factors and Gender Diversity on the ESG Disclosure Score: A Study on Indian Companies

“…ESG consideration for important stakeholders has increased multifold in the past many years (Cao et al, 2022). A metric for ESG was first launched in the form of a socially responsible index (SRI) by KLD Research & Analytics in the year 1990 which was followed by the creation of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index in 1999.…”

“…Environment, social and governance (ESG) investment strategy is increasingly becoming a popular and paying strategy for investment (Auer & Schuhmacher, 2016; Bofinger et al, 2022; Cao et al, 2022). Globally about US$2.7 trillion in assets were under management with funds focused on ESG strategy as on December 2021 (Bhagat, 2022).…”

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Firm Value: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

“…However, during the past two years, with the introduction of sustainable investment and green finance concepts, the Chinese government and regulators have implemented a series of policies to support ESG investment that have actively promoted the transition of enterprises towards eco-friendly practices and the development of sustainable industries [19]. ESG aligns with the green development concept and high-quality development directives [20,21], making it crucial in achieving the country's aspiration to become a true "manufacturing powerhouse" [22]. Second, this study introduces financing constraint as a mediating variable and R&D investment intensity as a moderating variable.…”