2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does more attractive choice always decrease choice deferral? The moderating effect of ideal point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Proposition 2 and Eq (13), the firm's expected benefits in the presence of only the firm's information sharing is as follows:…”
Section: Value Of Information Sharing and Deferral Option With Defaul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using Proposition 2 and Eq (13), the firm's expected benefits in the presence of only the firm's information sharing is as follows:…”
Section: Value Of Information Sharing and Deferral Option With Defaul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deferral (postponing one decision to a later date) is a recent occurrence in cybersecurity investment; however considerable research has been made in psychology [ 11 , 12 ] and management [ 13 , 14 ] literature. White et al [ 11 ] suggested that choice deferrals can arise from absolute evaluations or relative comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, based on the construal level theory, this paper reveals the influence mechanism of choice deferral behavior on intertemporal choice preference, and deepens the research on the after-effect of choice deferral behavior. Because consumers may lose sales opportunities if they do not make a purchase decision immediately, previous scholars pay more attention to the factors that lead to consumers' choice deferral behavior, such as different decision-making scenarios (Huang and Wang, 2019), the attractiveness of options (Larasati and Yeh, 2016), individual tolerance of uncertainty (Huang et al, 2014), and so on, so as to reduce this behavior as much as possible. However, the process of shopping is dynamic and relevant, consumers may not give up their purchase after a delayed choice, they may still consider the purchase decision, and it may even affect their future purchase decisions.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%