2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does my brain want what my eyes like? – How food liking and choice influence spatio-temporal brain dynamics of food viewing

Abstract: How food valuation affects decision-making, and how both influence the perception of food, is of major interest to better understand food intake behavior and, by extension, body weight management. Our study investigated behavioral responses and spatio-temporal brain dynamics by means of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in twenty-two normal-weight participants when viewing pairs of food photographs. Participants rated how much they liked each food item (valuation) and subsequently chose between the two alternati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
4
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our data suggest that high-fat food enhances human visual attention, but this effect might not be modulated strongly by subjective liking or perceived economic value. However, this result was inconsistent with a previous study showing that RTs associated with preferences are faster for more-liked food than less-liked food (Bielser et al, 2016). This discrepancy might be explained by the use of different tasks (i.e., a visual search task vs. task on food choice according to preferences).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, our data suggest that high-fat food enhances human visual attention, but this effect might not be modulated strongly by subjective liking or perceived economic value. However, this result was inconsistent with a previous study showing that RTs associated with preferences are faster for more-liked food than less-liked food (Bielser et al, 2016). This discrepancy might be explained by the use of different tasks (i.e., a visual search task vs. task on food choice according to preferences).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies using a visual probe task showed that hunger enhanced visual attention to food stimuli (Nijs et al, 2010; Tapper et al, 2010). Bielser et al (2016) also reported that the RTs of judgments concerning liking food were faster when the stimuli were an individual’s preferred food. Moreover, we assessed the evaluations of the monetary value of food items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 referencias son estudios en adultos mayores, del resto la mayor parte corresponde a adultos entre 20 a 40 años. En relación con las áreas de análisis definidas y nombradas previamente, los artículos escogidos se distribuyen de la siguiente forma: 8 trabajos (1,4,7,8,12,13,18,19) los circuitos neuronales de dicho mecanismo y su asociación con la ingesta de alimentos y sus alteraciones. Se analiza también, como cambia el mecanismo de recompensa durante el envejecimiento, la relación con el sentido del gusto, relación con la función de la dopamina, evaluación de aspectos hedónicos en la ingesta y relación con la obesidad.…”
Section: Fuente: Elaboración Propiaunclassified
“…comida. Específicamente, en relación con la elección de la comida, se han centrado en adultos entre 20 a 40 años, sanos y con un índice de masa corporal (IMC) normal (hasta 25), dejando de lado otras poblaciones de estudio (adultos por sobre 50 años, incluidos adultos mayores) y un análisis interdisciplinario (12,13).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified