2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does nanoparticles dispersed in a phase change material improve melting characteristics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the permeability coefficient C can be expected to depend on the morphology of the mushy zone. No consensus was found on the value of the permeability coefficient in the literature [24,[43][44][45][46][47]. The effects of this parameter on numerical results are therefore reported here.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The value of the permeability coefficient C can be expected to depend on the morphology of the mushy zone. No consensus was found on the value of the permeability coefficient in the literature [24,[43][44][45][46][47]. The effects of this parameter on numerical results are therefore reported here.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The A m is the mushzone constant which reflecting the morphology of melting front. The value of A m is chosen of 10 5 kg/m 3 s present study [28,37,38]. Additionally, λ is the liquid-fraction during the phase-change in temperature interval of T s < T < T l and it varies between 0 (solid) to 1 (liquid), which is defined as:…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the thermal energy storage capacity of PCMs decreases with the addition of nanoparticles. In consequence of this, many researchers have revealed the effect of adding nanoparticles inside the PCM based heat sink and/or rectangular or square enclosure [26,38,39,40,41]. For instance, Farsani et al [38] numerically studied the melting phenomenon of Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles dispersed PCM in a square cavity by varying the Rayleigh number and volume fraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the low thermal conductivity of PCM is the main disadvantage of its working performances. To overcome its disadvantage, many enhancement techniques have been proposed, such as using porous media/foam metals [10][11][12][13], adding nanoparticles [14][15][16], and expanding the heat transfer area by embedding fins [17][18][19][20][21] or honeycomb structures [22][23][24]. Compared to the former two methods, it is more suitable to expand the heat transfer area for latent thermal energy storage systems due to its low cost and convenience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%