1990
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90073-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does neuropsychological test performance predict resumption of drinking in posttreatment alcoholics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
44
2
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in alcohol use disorders, there are relationships between treatment efficacy-outcome and neurocognitive functioning. Essentially, patients who exhibit more severe cognitive deficits have higher rates of relapse (Parsons et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in alcohol use disorders, there are relationships between treatment efficacy-outcome and neurocognitive functioning. Essentially, patients who exhibit more severe cognitive deficits have higher rates of relapse (Parsons et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial period of mild confusional state (with impairments in attention, memory and comprehension) has been termed the 'cognitive haze' [44] . Neuropsychological deficits have a negative impact on treatment compliance and outcome, both directly, and indirectly through the mediation of other factors [1,45] . Impairment of executive functions in alcohol-dependent patients has been associated with relapse, higher rates of attrition from treatment and rehabilitation [46] , and greater social functioning difficulties such as marital disruption [47] and employment failure [18] , all of which can contribute toward poor treatment outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study (Bates et al, 2005) found a clinically significant, moderate effect size for change in memory in a large sample of alcoholics retested 6 weeks after entering treatment, whereas another (Mann et al, 1999) found no evidence for treatment-related improvements in memory tests after a comparable interval in a sample of 49 alcoholic men even though improvement occurred in other functional domains. Cross-sectional studies have shown that alcoholics sober for several months (Sullivan et al, 2000d;Sullivan et al, 2002;Meyerhoff, 2005;Rosenbloom et al, 2005), one year (Hochla et al, 1982;Parsons et al, 1990;Munro et al, 2000;Rosenbloom et al, 2004), or as long as seven years (Brandt et al, 1983) may still show memory deficits relative to non-alcoholic controls. However, other crosssectional studies have shown that performance on memory tests is related to length of abstinence (Joyce and Robbins, 1993;Oscar-Berman et al, 2004), and that alcoholics sober for more than 4 years are undistinguishable from controls on memory testing (Grant et al, 1984;Reed et al, 1992;Oscar-Berman et al, 2004;Fein et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%