Does organizational cronyism undermine social capital? Testing the mediating role of workplace ostracism and the moderating role of workplace incivility

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to test the mediating influence of workplace ostracism in the relationship between organizational cronyism and social capital. In addition, the authors posited that workplace incivility would interact with cronyism to directly influence social capital, and indirectly through its effect on workplace ostracism.Design/methodology/approachUsing data collected in four waves, with a time interval of six weeks between each wave, from 358 university faculty members, the authors used the PROCESS macro to test the proposed moderated mediation model.FindingsResults indicated that workplace ostracism mediates the influence of organizational cronyism on social capital, and that workplace incivility interacts with cronyism to influence social capital directly, and indirectly through its effect on workplace ostracism.Originality/valueMost studies of social capital are theoretical. The few empirical studies have focused on factors that contribute to social capital and virtually no research exists on factors that undermine social capital. Based on the premise that negative interpersonal relationships are far more powerful in explaining outcomes relative to positive interpersonal relations and the notion that “bad is stronger than good,” the authors draw on social exchange theory and the norm of negative reciprocity to test a moderated mediation model and identify a mechanism and the condition under which social capital is undermined. The results have important implications for theory, research and practice.

Toxic Leadership and Project Success: Underpinning the Role of Cronyism

“…Cronyism is a form of preferential treatment that leads to organizational injustice that further reduces the efficiency and effectiveness of individuals working there. Cronyism, as a negative factor adversely affects organizational performance by producing low morale, organizational inertia, and so forth [ 31 , 83 ]. The adverse effects of toxicity include the leader’s complicating the organizational structure by using poisoned power, reducing employee’s work efficiency and productivity through harmful behaviors such as disappointing workers, disregarding thoughts, marginalization, aggravation, emotional volatility, blaming others for personal mistakes, threatening employees’ job security and so forth and the use of cronyism [ 84 ].…”

PPP Mode of Water Pollution Prevention and Control Project Based on BP Neural Network

“…From the overall governance point of view, a "livable, beautiful and harmonious" living environment has been created for citizens by improving increasing green space, and improving public services. River-related historical allusions, literary masterpieces and folklore, highlighting the cultural heritage, have become an important way to inherit the historical context of Nanjing [13][14].…”

Relations outside the workplace matter! A nexus of coworker ostracism, relational capital, alternate belongingness and knowledge hiding

“…, 2022). Based on a social exchange perspective, workplace ostracism can reduce the level of relational social capital (Jawahar et al. , 2021).…”

“…A decent total of research highlighted that sometimes employees are involved in prosocial behaviour when they are being ostracized (Balliet and Ferris, 2013;Feinberg et al, 2014;Haldorai et al, 2022). Based on a social exchange perspective, workplace ostracism can reduce the level of relational social capital (Jawahar et al, 2021). Social capital development is important for overall knowledge management in organizations (Manning, 2010).…”