2018
DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Originality Evoke Understanding? The Relation between Literary Reading and Empathy

Abstract: It is easy enough to theorize about the impact of literary reading on empathic reactions, but to empirically prove such effects is more difficult. This article provides a concise overview of the theoretical and empirical evidence that literary reading has an effect on empathy (in its multiple forms), distinguishing between the effects of literariness, narrativity and fictionality. Subsequently, it discusses the results of 2 recently conducted studies into reading and empathic understanding. As will become clea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, though lifetime fiction exposure is positively associated with certain measures of social cognition, these positive associations may not generalize to the broader social construct. We recommend that in future work, researchers carefully delineate possible priming effects versus more durable changes with more naturalistic experiments that capitalize on positive aspects of reader engagement (e.g., transportation, intrinsic motivation to read; Mar, 2018b), and test for other characteristics of readers, readings, and their possible interactions (Koopman, 2018) that may influence fiction's social effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, though lifetime fiction exposure is positively associated with certain measures of social cognition, these positive associations may not generalize to the broader social construct. We recommend that in future work, researchers carefully delineate possible priming effects versus more durable changes with more naturalistic experiments that capitalize on positive aspects of reader engagement (e.g., transportation, intrinsic motivation to read; Mar, 2018b), and test for other characteristics of readers, readings, and their possible interactions (Koopman, 2018) that may influence fiction's social effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The story under review is a fictional literary narrative, in a way that covers all of the three basic discursive forms, namely narrativity (is structured around a sequence of events and goal-oriented characters), fictionality (is based on simulative processes of imagining what could have been or could happen) and literariness (contains aesthetic, foregrounded and unconventional stylistic features) (Koopman, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depictions of persons quickly help to communicate attitudes of stakeholders in a naturally accessible way, guiding us through the story. Stories told in this way are engaging, allow for empathizing with stakeholders, and are thus easy to understand [41]. Geo-comics naturally weave into their storytelling a depiction of stakeholders as they act in their environment.…”
Section: Character-driven Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%