2023
DOI: 10.1037/sgd0000547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does outness function the same for all sexual minority youth? Testing its associations with different aspects of well-being in a sample of youth with diverse sexual identities.

Abstract: While research generally supports that greater outness about one's sexual identity is associated with improved well-being, emerging evidence suggests that outness may have negative consequences for bisexual individuals. Yet few studies have examined sexual identity as a moderator of the associations between outness and well-being, especially among youth. As such, the role of outness in the mental health of diverse sexual minority youth (including pansexual, queer, questioning, and asexual youth) remains unclea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, our analysis showed that AGBM who reported being unsure of their sexual orientation, or did not answer, were significantly more likely to report having four or more sexual partners in the unadjusted models. This is congruent with the literature describing that disclosure of sexual orientation or “being out,” among teens was associated with lower depression and higher self-esteem for gay and lesbian youth (Rentería et al, 2022). However, this same study showed that among youth who had a sexual orientation of “questioning,” meaning they were unsure of their sexual orientation, being out was associated with higher reported depression, and there was no difference in their self-esteem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…By contrast, our analysis showed that AGBM who reported being unsure of their sexual orientation, or did not answer, were significantly more likely to report having four or more sexual partners in the unadjusted models. This is congruent with the literature describing that disclosure of sexual orientation or “being out,” among teens was associated with lower depression and higher self-esteem for gay and lesbian youth (Rentería et al, 2022). However, this same study showed that among youth who had a sexual orientation of “questioning,” meaning they were unsure of their sexual orientation, being out was associated with higher reported depression, and there was no difference in their self-esteem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, there is abundant evidence indicating that many gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals may internalize negative attitudes about their sexual orientation, which in turn can contribute to psychological distress (Berg et al, 2016; Israel et al, 2019). Similarly, asexual people are exposed to negative attitudes from family, friends, peers, and health care providers (Flanagan & Peters, 2020; Foster et al, 2019; Mollett, 2021) and also experience psychological distress (Borgogna et al, 2019; Rentería et al, 2022; Yule et al, 2013). Some of this psychological distress may be due to the internalization of negative attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are mixed as to whether asexual people experience more or less psychological distress than people of other sexual orientations. Some studies found higher levels of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in asexual people compared to heterosexual people (Borgogna et al, 2019; Yule et al, 2013) and more depression in asexual youth than bisexual youth (Rentería et al, 2022). Other studies found no significant differences between asexual individuals and nonasexual or heterosexual individuals in general well-being and life satisfaction (Greaves et al, 2017; Rothblum et al, 2020).…”
Section: Asexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on the association between SMY’s and GMY’s outness and well-being has been mixed, with being out associated with both better (e.g., fewer depressive symptoms; Rentería et al, 2023) and worse (e.g., more depressive symptoms and disclosure-related stress; Feinstein & Dyar, 2017; Pollitt et al, 2017) well-being. The association between both sexual and gender identity outness to family and well-being may be even more complex for gender diverse SMY as they experience double jeopardy (i.e., when individuals experience discrimination due to their multiple minoritized identities; Hancock & Daigle, 2021).…”
Section: Disclosure Of Sexual and Gender Minority (Sgm) Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%