2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00377-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does paraaortic lymphadenectomy have a benefit in the treatment of ovarian cancer that is apparently confined to the ovaries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Establishing the prognosis for a woman with ovarian cancer is an important part of the evaluation of the disease and the treatment. Multiple factors, eg, age, FIGO-stage, type of histology, tumor grade, residual disease, CA-125 level, ascites, and lymph node status have been reported to be important for the prognosis (12,13) . The prognostic value of lymph node assessment in early ovarian cancer is obvious, since the presence of node metastases upstages the tumors to FIGO stage III (13) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Establishing the prognosis for a woman with ovarian cancer is an important part of the evaluation of the disease and the treatment. Multiple factors, eg, age, FIGO-stage, type of histology, tumor grade, residual disease, CA-125 level, ascites, and lymph node status have been reported to be important for the prognosis (12,13) . The prognostic value of lymph node assessment in early ovarian cancer is obvious, since the presence of node metastases upstages the tumors to FIGO stage III (13) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple factors, eg, age, FIGO-stage, type of histology, tumor grade, residual disease, CA-125 level, ascites, and lymph node status have been reported to be important for the prognosis (12,13) . The prognostic value of lymph node assessment in early ovarian cancer is obvious, since the presence of node metastases upstages the tumors to FIGO stage III (13) . Various molecular markers have also been reported to be of prognostic value and prognostic indices or prognostic models have been constructed using a combination of these factors (12) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, systematic lymphadenectomy is not yet regarded as the standard surgical procedure because it increases surgical morbidity and its therapeutic significance is uncertain. There have been several reports suggesting that lymphadenectomy improves the prognosis for women with ovarian carcinoma9–11, but others remain unconvinced12, 13. Panici et al 14 carried out a prospective randomized study of women with optimally debulked advanced ovarian carcinoma, and reported that systematic lymphadenectomy improved progression‐free but not overall survival compared to the resection of bulky nodes only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Poncheville et al (11) disputed the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy, particularly in early ovarian cancer. These authors stressed the fact that survival of patients with early ovarian cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy is satisfactory.…”
Section: Intraoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%