Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes

Abstract

While patents are a valuable resource ensuring the competitive advantage of firms, there is limited evidence on the role of patents in the survival and exit strategies of new firms. To fill the gap in the literature, we examine whether the effects of patenting on new firm survival vary according to exit routes (bankruptcy, merger, and voluntary liquidation), while considering the endogeneity of patenting. We use a large-scale sample of new firms in the Japanese manufacturing and information services sectors for the period 2003–2013. The findings indicate that new firms with a higher stock of patents are less likely to go bankrupt. Conversely, new firms with a higher stock of patents are more likely to exit via merger. These findings are consistent, regardless of whether patent stock is measured based on the patent applications or granted patents. Furthermore, we provide evidence that new firms with a higher stock of granted patents are more likely to voluntarily liquidate their businesses. Plain English Summary Can new firms enjoy a “patent premium” in terms of survival and exit outcomes? The findings of this study indicate that (1) patenting reduces the risk of bankruptcy, and (2) it increases the odds of exit via merger and voluntary liquidation. On the one hand, patenting ensures that new firms obtain competitive advantages, and thus, survive in the product market. On the other hand, it enables new firms to pursue successful exit strategies in the markets for ideas. This study concludes that new firms can enjoy a patent premium in terms of survival and exit outcomes. In promoting sustainable economic growth via entrepreneurship, policymakers need to shift their focus from creating more firms to creating innovative firms.

UK government-backed start-up loans: Tackling disadvantage and credit rationing of new entrepreneurs

“…In general, the average loan that ends in default does so between 22 and 25 months after its origination. This is consistent with a large body of empirical evidence on loan default (Cowling et al, 2021;Glennon and Nigro, 2005), and more general firm survival after start-up (Holmes et al, 2010;Kato et al, 2022).…”

Value capture in open innovation markets: the role of patent rights for innovation appropriation

“…For startups and small firms the role of patents is still questioned. For example, the size of the patent portfolio does not necessarily improve sales performance among small firms (Agostini et al , 2015), while it does seem to decrease the likelihood of bankruptcy (Kato et al , 2021). Several studies have found that small firms have lower patent propensities than large firms (Arundel and Kabla, 1998; Brouwer and Kleinknecht, 1999; Chirico et al , 2020).…”

Enhancing insolvency frameworks to support economic renewal

“…Intangible capital, including intellectual property, data, design, trademarks and organisational capital, plays a decisive role in increasingly knowledge-based economies. Recent research on Japan suggests that patenting reduces bankruptcy risk and increases the odds of exit via merger and voluntary liquidation (Kato et al, 2021). In the case of liquidation, a rapid reallocation of transferable intangibles, such as intellectual property and data, supports the diffusion of technology and productivity growth.…”