2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-022-03129-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does pericapsular nerve group block have limited analgesia at the initial post-operative period? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Perioperative pain management related to hip surgical procedures is challenging. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel technique that is assumed to provide better analgesia in addition to its post-operative motor-sparing effect. In this review, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of PENG block on pain management in patients undergoing hip surgeries. Fifteen clinical trials with a total of 837 patients were included. Pain scores favored PENG group when compared to FICB group (fascia iliaca compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
2
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(92 reference statements)
1
9
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studies have focused more on postoperative pain outcomes and less on strength, the PENG block has continued to gain in popularity as authors compare it with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB). A double-blind RCT demonstrated reduced pain scores 12 h postoperatively when comparing the PENG block to FICB in the setting of hip fracture [25 ▪ ]. A meta-analysis by Farag et al [26] comparing PENG to FICB showed a statistically significant difference in pain scores 30 min after surgery but no significant difference after 6 h. Unfortunately, in this study, data regarding quadriceps muscle blockade was not analyzed given that both quantitative and qualitative scales were used differently across studies.…”
Section: Comparative-effectiveness Studies On Blocks For Hip Surgerymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although studies have focused more on postoperative pain outcomes and less on strength, the PENG block has continued to gain in popularity as authors compare it with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB). A double-blind RCT demonstrated reduced pain scores 12 h postoperatively when comparing the PENG block to FICB in the setting of hip fracture [25 ▪ ]. A meta-analysis by Farag et al [26] comparing PENG to FICB showed a statistically significant difference in pain scores 30 min after surgery but no significant difference after 6 h. Unfortunately, in this study, data regarding quadriceps muscle blockade was not analyzed given that both quantitative and qualitative scales were used differently across studies.…”
Section: Comparative-effectiveness Studies On Blocks For Hip Surgerymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This also can be advantageous in terms of limiting the volume of local anaesthetics to avoid any undesirable effects and preservation of motor function. The decreased opioid consumption was demonstrated only up to 24 hours after receiving the PENG block as suggested by Farag et al which led them to conclude that the analgesic effect post-PENG block wears off after 24 hours [ 29 ]. This may be overcome by adding SIFICB to the PENG block which ultimately becomes helpful to improve the outcome of patients after hip surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While PENG can blunt most sensory input from the anterior hip capsule, cutaneous coverage may have to be supplemented with LFCN or local subcutaneous infiltration for skin incision. Although PENG primarily targets anterior sensory coverage as evident in anterior or superficial surgical approaches, such as screw/pinning fixation for fractures and anterior THA, it also appears to impact positively on dynamic postoperative pain or pain on motion for a variety of posterior surgical approaches, such as hemiarthroplasties for fractures and posterior THA, as highlighted in several subsequent studies 27,28 . Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have found that PENG can provide better analgesia for a variety of hip surgeries and lower opioid consumption compared with established PNBs such as FNB or FIB 27,28 .…”
Section: Regional Anesthesiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PENG primarily targets anterior sensory coverage as evident in anterior or superficial surgical approaches, such as screw/pinning fixation for fractures and anterior THA, it also appears to impact positively on dynamic postoperative pain or pain on motion for a variety of posterior surgical approaches, such as hemiarthroplasties for fractures and posterior THA, as highlighted in several subsequent studies 27,28 . Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have found that PENG can provide better analgesia for a variety of hip surgeries and lower opioid consumption compared with established PNBs such as FNB or FIB 27,28 . Furthermore, patients receiving PENG had higher postoperative satisfaction levels and less of a motor block compared with other cohorts 28 .…”
Section: Regional Anesthesiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation