2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does players’ identification affect trust and reciprocity in the lab?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Allowing reputation formation increases trust (Berg et al 1995;Boero et al 2009;Charness et al 2011;Dubois et al 2012);  Third party punishment increases trust (Charness et al 2008);  Reduction in social distance increases trust, as shown by the effect of unbinding communication in Bracht and Feltovich (2009);  Fair procedures, such as consultative voting on the preferred outcome, increase trust in Bogliacino, Jiménez and Grimalda (2015).…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Allowing reputation formation increases trust (Berg et al 1995;Boero et al 2009;Charness et al 2011;Dubois et al 2012);  Third party punishment increases trust (Charness et al 2008);  Reduction in social distance increases trust, as shown by the effect of unbinding communication in Bracht and Feltovich (2009);  Fair procedures, such as consultative voting on the preferred outcome, increase trust in Bogliacino, Jiménez and Grimalda (2015).…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trust metric as average of previous sending amounts was used later on by other research works [8], [3], [25]. However, this average trust metric can not deal with user fluctuating behavior, as we discuss in Section IV.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our trust calculation will take into account this strategy that we call fluctuate strategy. In general, for trust games, trustworthiness of a user depends on the amount sent to her partners [8], [24]. A higher sending amount should lead to higher trustworthiness.…”
Section: Trust Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations