Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Terms of use:
Documents in EconStor may
AbstractIn this paper, we conduct an empirical analysis of the impact of better judicial enforcement on the probability of being credit rationed, loan size, and the probability of bankruptcy using household-level data from the Japanese Panel Survey of Consumers, conducted by the Institute for Research on Household Economics, in conjunction with judicial data by court district on trial length and the ratio of the number of pending civil trials to the number of incoming civil trials. Contrary to the predictions of the existing theory, we find that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of being credit rationed and decreases loan size. Furthermore, we find that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of bankruptcy, a result that is consistent with lax screening effects.Keywords: Judicial enforcement; Credit allocation; Credit rationing; Bankruptcy; Screening; Household Behavior; Borrowing JEL classification numbers: D12; G21; G33; K12; K41; K42 2 Since the mid-1990s, the impact of legal systems on the economy has been the focus of many theoretical and empirical investigations. As one example of this, many studies, which originate with La Porta, Lopez-De-Silanes, Shleifer, and Vishny (1997), have analyzed the relationship between legal systems and financial markets. In these studies, the following two channels through which the legal system affects financial markets were identified: (1) the degree of judicial enforcement and (2) the content of the law.In Japan, since laws apply to the nation as a whole, the content of the law is uniform in all judicial districts. However, the degree of judicial enforcement may vary from district to district. Thus, this paper focuses on differences in the degree of judicial enforcement from district to district. The fact that the content of the law is uniform throughout the country in Japan makes it possible to distinguish the impact of the degree of enforcement from that of the content of the law, whereas this is not possible in other countries, where different states have different laws.The length of trials in Japan has become shorter and shorter over time. For example, the average length of civil trial proceedings in district courts was 17.3 months in 1973, 12.9 months in 1990, and 7.8 months in 2006. In 2003, the "Act on the Expedition of Trials" 1 was promulgated with the objective of concluding trials as quickly as possible and protecting defendants' r...