2013
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does postharvest silviculture improve convergence of avian communities in managed and old-growth boreal forests?

Abstract: Habitat change following forest management may reduce biodiversity in boreal forests, as it has done globally in many forest types. Postharvest silviculture (PHS) is implemented to improve the yield of commercial tree species and has been applied to large areas of boreal forests. PHS may also influence animal communities and so we assessed songbird responses to these treatments in stands 20-52 years old in Ontario, Canada. We expected that several old-forest species would respond positively to PHS, that avian … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Eurpean boreal forests, Andren (1994) found no evidence for isolation effects on forest birds, but Mönkkönen et al (2000, cited in Schmiegelow andMönkkönen 2002) found that species richness and abundance of resident old-forest species in northern Finnish reserves declined with distance from continuous forests. Other studies have found much weaker effects of landscape variables than stand-level variables that explained numbers of boreal birds in Ontario (Venier and Pearce 2007;Thompson et al 2013). With most of these landscape-level variables, the evidence suggests that there are weak (relative to standscale influences), species-specific effects resulting from changes in habitat configuration related to increased isolation, edge density, and composition at the landscape scale.…”
Section: Birdsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Eurpean boreal forests, Andren (1994) found no evidence for isolation effects on forest birds, but Mönkkönen et al (2000, cited in Schmiegelow andMönkkönen 2002) found that species richness and abundance of resident old-forest species in northern Finnish reserves declined with distance from continuous forests. Other studies have found much weaker effects of landscape variables than stand-level variables that explained numbers of boreal birds in Ontario (Venier and Pearce 2007;Thompson et al 2013). With most of these landscape-level variables, the evidence suggests that there are weak (relative to standscale influences), species-specific effects resulting from changes in habitat configuration related to increased isolation, edge density, and composition at the landscape scale.…”
Section: Birdsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Further, it is important that the forests in the boreal zone are generally being maintained as forest, unlike agricultural areas with true fragmentation and habitat loss (Hobson and Bayne 2000b). Nevertheless, long-term effects on old-forest species remain uncertain (e.g., Venier and Pearce 2007;Thompson et al 2013).…”
Section: Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our second hypotheses, H2, posited that more severe site preparation would accelerate plant community succession relative to less severe treatments by increasing tree growth rates, speeding crown closure and increasing competition for light and other resources, thereby favouring shade-and stress-tolerant late seral plants (Grime 1979) over intolerant, resource-demanding early seral species (cf. Thompson et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%