2021
DOI: 10.3389/fspas.2021.676548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Processing or Formation of Water Ice Mantles Affect the Capacity of Nanosilicates to Be the Source of Anomalous Microwave Emission?

Abstract: Anomalous microwave emission (AME) is detected in many astrophysical environments as a foreground feature typically peaking between 20–30 GHz and extending over a 10–60 GHz range. One of the leading candidates for the source of AME is small spinning dust grains. Such grains should be very small (approx. ≤1 nm diameter) in order for the rotational emission to fall within the observed frequency range. In addition, these nanosized grains should possess a significant dipole moment to account for the observed emiss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 indicates that (1) if both nano-grain populations co-exist in the diffuse interstellar medium, then the AME must come predominantly from nano-carbon dust emission, and (2) if both populations have non-zero permanent electric dipole moments, then the abundance of nano-silicates cannot exceed ∼1%. This upper limit agrees with the findings of Désert et al (1986), Macià Escatllar & Bromley (2020), and Mariñoso Guiu et al (2021. All three studies derive an upper limit of Y Si = 1%.…”
Section: Combined Nano-carbon and Nano-silicate Dust Emissionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 indicates that (1) if both nano-grain populations co-exist in the diffuse interstellar medium, then the AME must come predominantly from nano-carbon dust emission, and (2) if both populations have non-zero permanent electric dipole moments, then the abundance of nano-silicates cannot exceed ∼1%. This upper limit agrees with the findings of Désert et al (1986), Macià Escatllar & Bromley (2020), and Mariñoso Guiu et al (2021. All three studies derive an upper limit of Y Si = 1%.…”
Section: Combined Nano-carbon and Nano-silicate Dust Emissionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This implies that even if it is possible to reproduce the intensity level at a single given frequency, for instance at 30 GHz, the spectral shape will be incorrect and accordingly, the required intensities at the two other frequencies cannot be retrieved. We note that the quantum mechanical calculations performed by Macià Escatllar & Bromley (2020) and Mariñoso Guiu et al (2021) show that Mg-rich nano-silicates will always have m > 1 D, even when they are covered by an ice layer. However, high dipole moments like this for nano-silicates appear to be inconsistent with the observations (see also Hensley & Draine 2017).…”
Section: Spinning Nano-silicate Dustmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…7 indicates that (1) if both nano-grain populations coexist in the diffuse interstellar medium, then the AME must come predominantly from nano-carbon dust emission, and (2) if both populations have non-zero permanent electric dipole moments, then the abundance of nano-silicates cannot exceed ∼ 1%. This upper limit agrees with the findings of Désert et al (1986), Macià Escatllar & Bromley (2020), and Mariñoso Guiu et al (2021. All three studies derive an upper limit of Y Si = 1%.…”
Section: Combined Nano-carbon and Nano-silicate Dust Emissionsupporting
confidence: 92%