Does progressive resistance strength training as additional training have any measured effect on functional outcomes in older hospitalized patients? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Tibaek, Sigrid; Andersen, Christina W; Pedersen, Sigrid; Rudolf, K.

doi:10.1177/0269215513501524

Cited by 19 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There were considerable differences in 'usual care' across studies, possibly due to differences in clinical practice and healthcare provision. Six studies described the exercise provision in the usual care groups [20][21][22][23][24][25]. Exercise was prescribed as two 45 minute sessions weekly [24] three times a…”

Section: Usual Carementioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies described the location of the intervention. Five trials were conducted solely in hospital [20][21][22][23]27], three trials had both in-hospital and post discharge components [24,26,28], and one trial occurred in the patients' home [25]. Of the six in-hospital studies, four reported starting the rehabilitative intervention within 72 hours of admission [20,23,26,27].…”

Section: Description Of the Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The third study reported that 58% of the intervention subjects had undertaken no home exercise as prescribed and only 19.5% in the intervention group performed 67-100% of their home exercises [28]. A further study measured the mean session attendance rate as 10 sessions per participant [23]. None of the studies reported intervention fidelity.…”

Section: Adherence To Treatment and Intervention Fidelitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five studies [20][21][22][23]27] compared an exercise based rehabilitation programme delivered in hospital to usual care. All studies measured daily function with questionnaires (Barthel Index, Katz, EMS).…”

Section: In Hospital Rehabilitation Vs Usual Carementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies [22,23,27] objectively measured function with the TUG. Outcomes were assessed on hospital discharge with two studies also repeating the functional measures at 1-month post discharge [20,21].…”

Section: In Hospital Rehabilitation Vs Usual Carementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Improving the rehabilitation of older people after emergency hospital admission

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Usual Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of the Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Adherence To Treatment and Intervention Fidelitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: In Hospital Rehabilitation Vs Usual Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: In Hospital Rehabilitation Vs Usual Carementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Improving the rehabilitation of older people after emergency hospital admission

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients

Hartley

Keating

Jeffs

et al. 2022

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map

Welch

Mathew

Babelmorad

et al. 2021

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background By 2030, the global population of people older than 60 years is expected to be higher than the number of children under 10 years, resulting in major health and social care system implications worldwide. Without a supportive environment, whether social or built, diminished functional ability may arise in older people. Functional ability comprises an individual's intrinsic capacity and people's interaction with their environment enabling them to be and do what they value. Objectives This evidence and gap map aims to identify primary studies and systematic reviews of health and social support services as well as assistive devices designed to support functional ability among older adults living at home or in other places of residence. Search Methods We systematically searched from inception to August 2018 in: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AgeLine, Campbell Library, ASSIA, Social Science Citation Index and Social Policy & Practice. We conducted a focused search for grey literature and protocols of studies (e.g., ProQuest Theses and Dissertation Global, conference abstract databases, Help Age, PROSPERO, Cochrane and Campbell libraries and http://ClinicalTrials.gov). Selection Criteria Screening and data extraction were performed independently in duplicate according to our intervention and outcome framework. We included completed and on‐going systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials of effectiveness on health and social support services provided at home, assistive products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation as well as design, construction and building products and technology of buildings for private use such as wheelchairs, and ramps. Data Collection and Analysis We coded interventions and outcomes, and the number of studies that assessed health inequities across equity factors. We mapped outcomes based on the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) adapted categories: intrinsic capacities (body function and structures) and functional abilities (activities). We assessed methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR II checklist. Main Results After de‐duplication, 10,783 records were screened. The map includes 548 studies (120 systematic reviews and 428 randomized controlled trials). Interventions and outcomes were classified using domains from the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Most systematic reviews (n = 71, 59%) were rated low or critically low for methodological quality. The most common interventions were home‐based rehabilitation for older adults (n = 276) and home‐based health services for disease prevention (n = 233), mostly delivered by visiting healthcare professionals (n = 474). There was a relative paucity of studies on personal mobility, building adaptations, family support, personal support and befriending or friendly visits. The most measured intrinsic capacity domains were mental functio...

show abstract

Does progressive resistance strength training as additional training have any measured effect on functional outcomes in older hospitalized patients? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Abstract: The results indicate that for older hospitalized patients progressive resistance strength training as additional training may have an effect compared to standard care, but no statistically significant effects were demonstrated when measured by functional outcomes.

Cited by 19 publications

References 38 publications

Improving the rehabilitation of older people after emergency hospital admission

Improving the rehabilitation of older people after emergency hospital admission

Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients

Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About