2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does prostate-specific antigen nadir predict longer-term outcomes of prostate cancer after neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in conjunction with brachytherapy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Threshold levels of nPSA for the prediction of treatment failure vary depending on the local extent of the cancer, the type of radiotherapy, and the duration of ADT. Our value of nPSA for predicting the clinical outcome is an extremely low level compared with previous studies – ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 ng/ml [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Combined HDR brachytherapy and EBRT could deliver effective radiation doses more precisely and intensely than conventional EBRT, with some margin even in patients with extracapsular extensions and seminal vesicle invasion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Threshold levels of nPSA for the prediction of treatment failure vary depending on the local extent of the cancer, the type of radiotherapy, and the duration of ADT. Our value of nPSA for predicting the clinical outcome is an extremely low level compared with previous studies – ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 ng/ml [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Combined HDR brachytherapy and EBRT could deliver effective radiation doses more precisely and intensely than conventional EBRT, with some margin even in patients with extracapsular extensions and seminal vesicle invasion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…As in our results, Kamrava et al found that T stage, GS, and use of ADT were significantly associated with CSS on univariate analysis, but on multivariate analysis only GS and use of ADT were significantly associated CSS [30] It is expected that the grouping of the patients in risk groups for biochemical failure based on PSAi, GS and CS, to aggregate patients with adverse features in the intermediate and high risk, leading to worse CSS and BC for the two last one, what was confirmed in our analysis. This was also observed by Morris et al [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In our series, as in others, patients who received adjuvant ADT had significantly higher risk features suggesting patient selection bias for CSS in this group of patients, instead of a negative interaction between HDR and EBRT [31][32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…While the Phoenix definition is the current standard to define biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with a rising PSA after primary RT [1], it represents a threshold value which has known limitations with respect to establishing disease recurrence and outcome [2]. Other biochemical metrics—such as nadir PSA, PSA velocity, and PSA doubling time—may provide additional prognostic information [3,4]; however, no biochemical threshold has been proven to localize recurrence and, with the exception of nadir PSA, all require longitudinal PSA measures. Given that local salvage treatment of recurrent CaP can result in cancer-specific survival of up to 70–83% at 10 yr [5], accurate localization of recurrence site is critically important for the optimal management of patients with a rising PSA after RT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%