2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does public education reduce ice storm-related carbon monoxide exposure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence indicates that intensive public education before and after a storm can decrease CO poisonings, especially among minority groups. 22 Because of challenges in communicating with people without electricity and because CO poisonings have been documented as early as nine hours after a storm, 9 dissemination of prevention messages should begin before storms whenever possible. Messages disseminated after storms should begin immediately, because the majority of CO-poisoning cases after storms occur on days two and three, 5 and should use multiple forms of media to reach people without electricity (e.g., radio, fact sheets, door-to-door campaigns, and mobile telephone text messages).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence indicates that intensive public education before and after a storm can decrease CO poisonings, especially among minority groups. 22 Because of challenges in communicating with people without electricity and because CO poisonings have been documented as early as nine hours after a storm, 9 dissemination of prevention messages should begin before storms whenever possible. Messages disseminated after storms should begin immediately, because the majority of CO-poisoning cases after storms occur on days two and three, 5 and should use multiple forms of media to reach people without electricity (e.g., radio, fact sheets, door-to-door campaigns, and mobile telephone text messages).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature demonstrates that Latino immigrants are at higher risk of CO poisoning, and promotion of this awareness, specifically, to this group is needed (Runyan, Johnson et al, 2005). There have been recommendations for combination interventions of public education along with the distribution of safety devices (CDC, 2004;Lin & Conners, 2005). The CDC supports the recommendation made by the Consumer Product Safety Commission that a functioning CO detector can protect individuals from unintentional CO exposure and save lives.…”
Section: > Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Racial and ethnic differences have also been found in terms of the source of CO emissions. In general, the prevailing source for CO exposure among Whites is from gas-powered generators with charcoal briquettes being the most-common source of CO exposures in Asian, African and to a lesser degree Hispanic immigrant populations (Broder et al, 2005;Gulati et al, 2009;Houck & Hampson, 1997;Lin & Conners, 2005;Ralston & Hampson, 2000;Wrenn & Conners, 1997). This trend was observed across the nation and for numerous winter events.…”
Section: Carbon Monoxide: the Silent Killermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By far, the prevailing source of CO poisoning after a winter weather event is from gas-powered generators with other common sources being propane heaters, vehicles and charcoal briquettes (Daley et al, 2000;Gulati et al, 2009;Houck & Hampson, 1997;Lin & Conners, 2005;Wrenn & Conners, 1997). Closer examination of CO injuries has shown a clear vulnerability among ethnic groups, with minority and immigrant populations suffering a disproportionate burden of CO injuries and deaths.…”
Section: Carbon Monoxide: the Silent Killermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation