Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In the last 2 decades, there have been many important advances in breast cancer prevention and diagnosis, and this has resulted in more women being diagnosed with early-stage disease than ever before. It is also true that because of a number of advances in treatment, those with more advanced disease at diagnosis are living longer and better lives.However, the racial gap in breast cancer outcomes continues to be a huge issue. A number of studies have demonstrated worse outcomes for black women with breast cancer in comparison with white women. For example, in a large study of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data available from 1999-2014, black women were found to present more commonly with regional or advanced disease in comparison with white women (46% vs 36%), and they had a 41% higher breast cancer-specific mortality rate (30 vs 21 deaths per 100,000 women). 1 In addition, in a population-based study of young patients with breast cancer (age <55 years) in Atlanta, Georgia, we noted significantly poorer outcomes for black patients (hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5) with race-based differences in survival that persisted within the triple-negative subgroup even when we controlled for treatment and other comorbidities (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-3.7). 2 These disparities are alarming, and there is no question that deepening our understanding of the factors that drive them will be critical for addressing them properly.The significant disparity between outcomes for black and white women with breast cancer is almost certainly multifactorial, and this often makes the relative contributions of socioeconomic factors and disease biology difficult to tease out. Socioeconomic factors such as body mass index, reproductive patterns, access to health care, and treatment adherence clearly play a role. However, it is increasingly evident that tumor biology is a critical factor. Compared with their white counterparts, black women tend to be diagnosed at younger ages and are more likely to be diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); in comparison with white women who do have TNBC, there are compelling data showing that black women have tumors that behave more aggressively. [2][3][4][5] In the current issue of Cancer, Walsh et al 6 investigate the association between race and breast cancer outcomes by comparing black and white women treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, a highly specialized tertiary care cancer center in Manhattan. Black women had inferior disease-free survival (5-year disease-free survival, 86% for black women vs 91% for white women) and overall survival (5-year overall survival, 88% for black women vs 94% for white women). Interestingly, however, race was not found to be an independent prognostic indicator when important disease-related factors such as tumor size, nodal burden, and molecular subtype were taken into account. Importantly, in this study, all women had health insurance and had actively sought out care at one of the top cancer centers in the country. Therefor...
In the last 2 decades, there have been many important advances in breast cancer prevention and diagnosis, and this has resulted in more women being diagnosed with early-stage disease than ever before. It is also true that because of a number of advances in treatment, those with more advanced disease at diagnosis are living longer and better lives.However, the racial gap in breast cancer outcomes continues to be a huge issue. A number of studies have demonstrated worse outcomes for black women with breast cancer in comparison with white women. For example, in a large study of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data available from 1999-2014, black women were found to present more commonly with regional or advanced disease in comparison with white women (46% vs 36%), and they had a 41% higher breast cancer-specific mortality rate (30 vs 21 deaths per 100,000 women). 1 In addition, in a population-based study of young patients with breast cancer (age <55 years) in Atlanta, Georgia, we noted significantly poorer outcomes for black patients (hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5) with race-based differences in survival that persisted within the triple-negative subgroup even when we controlled for treatment and other comorbidities (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-3.7). 2 These disparities are alarming, and there is no question that deepening our understanding of the factors that drive them will be critical for addressing them properly.The significant disparity between outcomes for black and white women with breast cancer is almost certainly multifactorial, and this often makes the relative contributions of socioeconomic factors and disease biology difficult to tease out. Socioeconomic factors such as body mass index, reproductive patterns, access to health care, and treatment adherence clearly play a role. However, it is increasingly evident that tumor biology is a critical factor. Compared with their white counterparts, black women tend to be diagnosed at younger ages and are more likely to be diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); in comparison with white women who do have TNBC, there are compelling data showing that black women have tumors that behave more aggressively. [2][3][4][5] In the current issue of Cancer, Walsh et al 6 investigate the association between race and breast cancer outcomes by comparing black and white women treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, a highly specialized tertiary care cancer center in Manhattan. Black women had inferior disease-free survival (5-year disease-free survival, 86% for black women vs 91% for white women) and overall survival (5-year overall survival, 88% for black women vs 94% for white women). Interestingly, however, race was not found to be an independent prognostic indicator when important disease-related factors such as tumor size, nodal burden, and molecular subtype were taken into account. Importantly, in this study, all women had health insurance and had actively sought out care at one of the top cancer centers in the country. Therefor...
ImportanceYoung Black women bear a disproportionate burden of breast cancer deaths compared with White women, yet they remain underrepresented in genomic studies.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of biological factors, including West African genetic ancestry, and nonbiological factors with disease-free survival (DFS) among young Black women with breast cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis observational cohort study included Black women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016. Participants diagnosed with breast cancer at age 50 years or younger were recruited through the Florida and Tennessee state cancer registries. The final analysis was completed between June and September 2024.ExposureWest African genetic ancestry.Main Outcomes and MeasuresA multivariable model was developed to evaluate the association between West African genetic ancestry and breast cancer DFS, adjusting for immunohistochemistry subtype, lymph node (LN) status, and full-time employment.ResultsThis study included 687 Black women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Their median age at diagnosis was 44 years (IQR, 38-47 years), and the median follow-up was 10 years (IQR, 7-11 years). In multivariable analysis, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and LN involvement were associated with shorter breast cancer DFS (hazard ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.20-2.73] and 1.77 [95% CI, 1.30-2.41], respectively), whereas full-time employment was associated with improved outcomes (hazard ratio, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.63]). Among the 551 participants for whom global genetic ancestry could be assessed, having a higher percentage of West African genetic ancestry was associated with shorter breast cancer DFS among 246 participants in the hormone receptor (HR)–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2])–negative subgroup (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.04-2.04]). Of the 369 participants (53.7%) with PAM50 data available, basal (133 [36.0%]) and luminal B (107 [29.0%]) subtypes were the most common. Among the 179 patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative disease and PAM50 data available, luminal B and basal subtypes combined were also overrepresented (81 [45.3%] and 24 [13.4%], respectively) compared with luminal A (70 [39.1%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study of young Black women with breast cancer, having a higher percentage of West African genetic ancestry, TNBC, and LN involvement were associated with shorter breast cancer DFS. Interestingly, full-time employment was associated with improved breast cancer DFS. These findings highlight the importance of considering genetic ancestry beyond self-reported race and accounting for social determinants of health, in efforts to improve survival outcomes among Black women with breast cancer.
BackgroundThe survival of women with early‐stage breast cancer varies by racial group. Filipino women with breast cancer are an understudied group and are often combined with other Asian groups. We compared clinical presentations and survival rates for Filipino and White women with breast cancer diagnosed in the United States.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 in the SEER18 registries database. We compared crude survival between Filipino and White women. We then calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) in a propensity‐matched design using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThere were 10,834 Filipino (2.5%) and 414,618 White women (97.5%) with Stage I–IV breast cancer in the SEER database. The mean age at diagnosis was 57.5 years for Filipino women and 60.8 years for White women (p < 0.0001). Filipino women had more high‐grade and larger tumors than White women and were more likely to have node‐positive disease. Among women with Stage I–IIIC breast cancer, the crude 10‐year breast cancer‐specific survival rate was 91.0% for Filipino and 88.9% for White women (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88, p < 0.01). In a propensity‐matched analysis, the HR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.66–0.81). The survival advantage for Filipino women was present in subgroups defined by age of diagnosis, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, and HER2 receptor status.ConclusionIn the United States, Filipino women often present with more advanced breast cancers than White women, but experience better breast cancer‐specific survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.