2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does radiotherapy affect tattoo fading in breast reconstruction patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Papers were classified by publication type (full texts or abstracts). Eight studies evaluated the satisfaction rate given by the patients, and three the aesthetic results, mostly considering appearance and symmetry [ 10 ], color match [ 23 ]; one study also evaluated the perceived usefulness of the NAC tattoo service [ 2 ]; one paper aimed to identify the risk factors for tattoo-related breast infections [ 13 ]; two studies focused on the relationship between radiotherapy and tattoo fading [ 24 , 25 ]; one study involved healthcare personnel, determining if the likelihood of discussing options for NAC tattooing differed between Registered Nurses (RNs) and non-RNs [ 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Papers were classified by publication type (full texts or abstracts). Eight studies evaluated the satisfaction rate given by the patients, and three the aesthetic results, mostly considering appearance and symmetry [ 10 ], color match [ 23 ]; one study also evaluated the perceived usefulness of the NAC tattoo service [ 2 ]; one paper aimed to identify the risk factors for tattoo-related breast infections [ 13 ]; two studies focused on the relationship between radiotherapy and tattoo fading [ 24 , 25 ]; one study involved healthcare personnel, determining if the likelihood of discussing options for NAC tattooing differed between Registered Nurses (RNs) and non-RNs [ 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in Table 1 , the overall quality of evidence is weak: most of the results were observational studies (based on medical records [ 13 ], with small samples [ 6 ], not methodologically rigorous [ 23 , 25 , 27 ]). Another limitation was found in the outcome measurement: none of the studies used validated instruments except one [ 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations