2013
DOI: 10.1080/17586801.2013.855619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does reading in an alphasyllabary affect phonemic awareness? Inherent schwa effects in Marathi-English bilinguals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, depending on word context, the schwa may not be pronounced, so the simple consonant can represent a phoneme. See Bhide, Gadgil, Zelinsky, & Perfetti (2014) They could press the speaker to hear it again. The picture depicts the meaning of the word.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, depending on word context, the schwa may not be pronounced, so the simple consonant can represent a phoneme. See Bhide, Gadgil, Zelinsky, & Perfetti (2014) They could press the speaker to hear it again. The picture depicts the meaning of the word.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a comprehensive theory of literacy learning will have to factor in the learning mechanisms involved in the akshara languages, particularly the role of domains such as visual memory, morphology and syntax, and several other aspects of the orthography. Some of these include non-linear symbol arrangements (Vaid and Gupta, 2002 ; Kandhadai and Sproat, 2010 ; Winskel and Perea, 2014 ), unmarked and inherent symbol features (Nag, 2007 ; Bhide et al, 2014 ), visually complex symbol sets (Nag et al, 2014 ) and word types differing because of symbol characteristics (Nag, 2014 ; Wijayathilake and Parrila, 2014 ) or morpho-orthographic characteristics (Rao et al, 2012 ). A step before the hunt for higher-order universals would be to bring focus in reading science on these kinds of particularities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthographic input can influence phonological representations in both the L1 (e.g., Bhide, Gadgil, Zelinsky, & Perfetti, 2014;Ehri & Wilce, 1980) and the L2 (e.g., Bassetti & Atkinson, 2015;Escudero, Hayes-Harb, & Mitterer, 2008;Jesry, 2005;Meng, 1998;Showalter & Hayes-Harb, 2013;Young-Scholten, 1997Young-Scholten & Langer, 2015). For example, although L2 learners of Chinese generally do not omit vowels in speech, they do when those vowels are not represented in the orthography of pinyin, an alphabetic writing system that uses Roman letters to phonetically represent Chinese characters (Bassetti, 2006(Bassetti, , 2007Ye, Cui, & Lin, 1997).…”
Section: Orthographic Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%