2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does recycling solar panels make this renewable resource sustainable? Evidence supported by environmental, economic, and social dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter would reduce the need for extraction and primary processing, found to be the most impactful stages in the life cycle of green hydrogen. For example, recycling solar PV panels may reduce human and freshwater toxicity by up to 78% [79] and reduce ReCiPe endpoint indicators of the panels by two-thirds through a combination of thermal, chemical, and mechanical recycling [80]. Additionally, improved waste treatment practices related to tailings (mining) and slags and sludge (steel making) can further reduce impacts associated with the remaining metals that need to be extracted to enable a hydrogen economy.…”
Section: Changes Of Practice Not Yet Represented In Current Prospecti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter would reduce the need for extraction and primary processing, found to be the most impactful stages in the life cycle of green hydrogen. For example, recycling solar PV panels may reduce human and freshwater toxicity by up to 78% [79] and reduce ReCiPe endpoint indicators of the panels by two-thirds through a combination of thermal, chemical, and mechanical recycling [80]. Additionally, improved waste treatment practices related to tailings (mining) and slags and sludge (steel making) can further reduce impacts associated with the remaining metals that need to be extracted to enable a hydrogen economy.…”
Section: Changes Of Practice Not Yet Represented In Current Prospecti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many of the CCUS technologies relating to carbon sinks are still under development, and entail uncertainties regarding pricing and environmental implications, in addition to risks such as leakage and public nonacceptance along with fire and diseases for nature-based carbon sinks (Fawzy et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2022). There are also concerns relating to the end-of-life waste produced by these technologies, such as solar panel waste (Daniela-Abigail et al, 2021;Mathur, Gregory, & Hogan, 2021). Therefore, it is recommended AGJSR that all decarbonization technologies undergo a lifecycle assessment (Chen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Policy Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2022). There are also concerns relating to the end-of-life waste produced by these technologies, such as solar panel waste (Daniela-Abigail et al. , 2021; Mathur, Gregory, & Hogan, 2021).…”
Section: Policy Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous use of unsanitary energy will result in global environmental damage. Due to environmental damage that comes from unsanitary energy, people are aware of switching to using alternative energy such as solar panels [3], [4]. Besides able to reducing environmental damage, the use of solar panels can save electricity costs continuously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%