2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does refining the phenotype improve replication rates? A review and replication of candidate gene studies on Major Depressive Disorder and Chronic Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract: Replication has been poor for previously reported candidate genes involved in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). One possible reason is phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. The present study replicated genetic associations with MDD as defined in DSM-IV and with a more narrowly defined MDD subtype with a chronic and severe course. We first conducted a systematic review of genetic association studies on MDD published between September 2007 and June 2012 to identify all reported candidate genes. Genetic associatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the literature on candidate genes for MDD and GxE interaction in MDD is very broad, we focused on papers that reviewed the previous work in the field. The candidate list comprises SNPs/genes that were taken from two major reviews (Mandelli and Serretti, 2013 for GxE interaction in MDD; Luo et al, 2016 for candidate genes/SNPs in MDD). These candidates cover genes from central monoaminergic systems such as serotonin, dopamine or noradrenalin, from the glutamatergic system, corticotrophin system, neurotropic system or from inflammatory processes (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the literature on candidate genes for MDD and GxE interaction in MDD is very broad, we focused on papers that reviewed the previous work in the field. The candidate list comprises SNPs/genes that were taken from two major reviews (Mandelli and Serretti, 2013 for GxE interaction in MDD; Luo et al, 2016 for candidate genes/SNPs in MDD). These candidates cover genes from central monoaminergic systems such as serotonin, dopamine or noradrenalin, from the glutamatergic system, corticotrophin system, neurotropic system or from inflammatory processes (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several candidate genes and GWAS studies have been performed to identify risk genes, but often these studies used admixed populations. At least 97 candidate genes have been reported showing risk variants for MDD, but replication efforts have not consistently been successful, perhaps due to the role of environmental factors; they have been more successful in selected subsamples, highlighting the necessity to better ascertain the phenotype and study homogenous family datasets (Luo et al, ). Recently, a low‐coverage whole‐genome sequencing in a case–control study of Han Chinese women with recurrent MDD identified two genome‐wide significant loci, one near sirtuin 1 ( SIRT1 ), and the other in the phospholysine phosphohistidine inorganic pyrophosphate phosphatase ( LHPP ) gene; both loci were replicated in an independent Chinese sample, and highly significant in the discovery and replication joint analysis (consortium, ).…”
Section: Metabolic Diseases Mental Diseases and Their Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heritability of MDD is estimated to be around 30-40% [9,10], indicating that genetic factors have a pivotal role in MDD. Though great effort has been made to investigate the genetic underpinnings of MDD, only limited risk variants and genes have been identified by genetic linkage and association studies [11][12][13][14][15]. The advent of GWAS provides an opportunity to explore the genetic basis of MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%