2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14946-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does regional planning policy of Yangtze River Delta improve green technology innovation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the choice of econometric model, unlike the general policy of full roll-out, the pilot policy of PFTZ construction is set in different regions, and the data is continuous. At the same time, compared to normal policy assessment methods, DID method can better address the endogeneity problem (Basri et al, 2021 ; Londoño-Vélez and Ávila-Mahecha, 2021 ; Xu et al, 2022 ; Xu et al, 2021 ) and more accurately assess the impact effect of the PFTZ construction on urban GTFP. Therefore, based on panel data of 279 cities in China from 2004 to 2018, this study takes the establishment of PFTZ as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the time-varying difference-in-differences method to explore whether the establishment of PFTZ promotes urban GTFP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the choice of econometric model, unlike the general policy of full roll-out, the pilot policy of PFTZ construction is set in different regions, and the data is continuous. At the same time, compared to normal policy assessment methods, DID method can better address the endogeneity problem (Basri et al, 2021 ; Londoño-Vélez and Ávila-Mahecha, 2021 ; Xu et al, 2022 ; Xu et al, 2021 ) and more accurately assess the impact effect of the PFTZ construction on urban GTFP. Therefore, based on panel data of 279 cities in China from 2004 to 2018, this study takes the establishment of PFTZ as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the time-varying difference-in-differences method to explore whether the establishment of PFTZ promotes urban GTFP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional planning is a public policy tool common to both developed and developing countries (Beloto, 2020;Davis, 2004;Li and Wu, 2013). China's regional planning aims to achieve a coordinated layout of regional economic and innovation factors based on the geographical location of cities in the region (Xu et al, 2021). As urban system planning is a type of regional planning in China, this study uses the Urban System planning of Shandong Province (2011-2030) case to illustrate the specific application of the results of a city supply network study in optimizing regional planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since areas with better ecological endowments coincide with poorer areas, in order to accurately estimate the causal effect of poverty eradication policy implementation on county ecological quality, it is necessary to exclude endogeneity due to omitted variables, reverse causality and interference from other factors, and reduce the interference of endogeneity in the identification of disturbance causality. Therefore, this paper adopts the difference-in-differences (DID) model (Alari et al, 2021;Wang and Li, 2019) and refers to the model settings of Chen and Xu, on the basis of controlling for regional and year fixed effects (Chen et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021), eliminating the differences in natural, geographic and economic conditions that do not change over time between the two groups before and after the policy intervention and external shocks from the national level (Athey and Imbens, 2006;Davies et al, 2008;Hawkins and Baum, 2016), in order to exclude other factors from interfering as much as possible, and finally obtain the following model 1). For robustness testing, this paper uses a series of methods such as propensity score matching method, changing time intervals, changing variable measures, changing model settings, and lagging variables to test the robustness of the results.…”
Section: Empirical Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%