Abstract:Reoperation for abdominal sepsis frequently causes substantial hypotension, and is, thus, potentially harmful to the patient. Reoperative trauma may induce an early postoperative increase in interleukin-6 levels. Because this increase occurs before the development of hypotension, a relationship between the kinetics of this cytokine and the observed hemodynamic instability may be present.
“…> Bei adäquater Fokussanierung und gründlicher Lavage reicht in ca. 90% eine einzige Operation aus Sautner und Kollegen konnten nachweisen, dass geplante Relaparotomien durch die systemische Entzündungsant-wort schädlich sein können [6,23]. Zudem steigt die Rate lokaler und systemischer Komplikationen mit der Anzahl geplanter Relaparotomien an [13].…”
Despite significant progress the therapy of peritonitis remains challenging. With a mortality of up to 20% peritonitis is a predominant cause of death due to surgical infections. An early and efficient source control combined with effective antibiotic therapy and modern intensive care and sepsis therapy are definitive for the outcome and prognosis of secondary peritonitis. In approximately 90% of patients an effective source control can be achieved by one single operation with extensive peritoneal lavage. A reoperation is necessary in only about 10% of patients. The aggressive concepts of planned relaparotomy or open packing are associated with increased morbidity and are indicated only in rare cases. The gold standard is to attempt a definitive source control by one single operation. An operative revision should be performed only on demand. The antibiotic therapy should begin with a broadly calculated empirical therapy and should later be adapted to microbiological findings. The therapy of sepsis requires standardized and state of the art intensive care.
“…> Bei adäquater Fokussanierung und gründlicher Lavage reicht in ca. 90% eine einzige Operation aus Sautner und Kollegen konnten nachweisen, dass geplante Relaparotomien durch die systemische Entzündungsant-wort schädlich sein können [6,23]. Zudem steigt die Rate lokaler und systemischer Komplikationen mit der Anzahl geplanter Relaparotomien an [13].…”
Despite significant progress the therapy of peritonitis remains challenging. With a mortality of up to 20% peritonitis is a predominant cause of death due to surgical infections. An early and efficient source control combined with effective antibiotic therapy and modern intensive care and sepsis therapy are definitive for the outcome and prognosis of secondary peritonitis. In approximately 90% of patients an effective source control can be achieved by one single operation with extensive peritoneal lavage. A reoperation is necessary in only about 10% of patients. The aggressive concepts of planned relaparotomy or open packing are associated with increased morbidity and are indicated only in rare cases. The gold standard is to attempt a definitive source control by one single operation. An operative revision should be performed only on demand. The antibiotic therapy should begin with a broadly calculated empirical therapy and should later be adapted to microbiological findings. The therapy of sepsis requires standardized and state of the art intensive care.
“…[2][3][4] However, repeated or even unnecessary surgical procedures are an additional risk factor for the patient and may further enhance morbidity. [5][6][7] Facing this clinical dilemma, there is major interest in the search for an optimum diagnostic tool for an early, noninvasive, and reliable diagnosis of abdominal infections and sepsis. 8 Clinical scoring systems allow satisfactory prediction of overall prognosis [9][10][11][12][13][14] and are an established means of interinstitutional comparison of patient groups for study purposes.…”
Infections and sepsis are major complications in secondary peritonitis and still represent a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that the laboratory marker procalcitonin would provide an early and reliable assessment of septic complications.
“…In some studies, high mortality rates have been reported following UARLs performed due to peritonitis. On the other hand, there are studies reporting reduced mortality rates following planned re-laparatomies since they provided effective irrigation and drainage (11)(12)(13)(14). Consideration of UARLs has been suggested in the treatment of uncontrolled intra-abdominal infection and multisystem organ failure (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite multi-redolaparatomies performed on the patients, high mortality rates were encountered. In the study of Sautner T et al, re-laparatomies performed on patients with abdominal sepsis were reported to increase the inflammatory response, and the increased inflammatory response was reported to increase the mortality rates (12). In another study, re-laparatomy was reported to change the multi-system organ failure into an irreversible situation when the treatment to be performed with re-laparatomy was not properly selected (16).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.