“…The use of PLS‐SEM may be rationalized for a variety of reasons: - The PLS‐SEM technique enables scholars to simultaneously evaluate the relationships between items and their related latent constructs (e.g., measurement model) and the relationship between constructs (e.g., structural model).
- Hair et al (2017) confirmed its versatility for complex frameworks, specifically for models including moderation and mediation.
- PLS‐SEM is suitable for both small and large datasets and can provide accurate results.
- Unlike CB‐SEM, PLS‐SEM can reliably estimate parameters under non‐normal data distributions (Hair et al, 2019).
- Compared to other path modeling tools like LISREL or AMOS, variance‐based [SmartPLS] provides a simple graphical interface.
- This powerful component‐based technique has been widely used in recent studies (e.g., Abid et al, 2023; Abualigah et al, 2022; Aftab, Sarwar, Kiran, Qureshi, et al, 2022; Aftab, Sarwar, Kiran, Abid, & Ahmad, 2022; Farrukh et al, 2022; Kim et al, 2019; Ojo et al, 2022; Ojo & Raman, 2019; Pham et al, 2020; Sarwar et al, 2023; Sharma et al, 2021; Shoaib et al, 2021).
There are two phases to the analysis process in PLS‐SEM: (1) the external model and (2) the internal model, discussed in the following sections.…”