2022
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Restricting Managers' Discretion through GAAP Impact the Usefulness of Accounting Information in Debt Contracting?†

Abstract: We examine whether restricting managers' discretion through GAAP impacts the usefulness of accounting information in debt contracting. Our study informs standard setters and regulators regarding the debt contracting implications of limiting managers' discretion via accounting standards. We predict and find that under more restrictive standards, lenders make more non‐GAAP modifications to GAAP‐based performance measures, suggesting that restrictions of managers' discretion reduce the usefulness of accounting in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we contribute broadly to research examining the effects of accounting standards on financial statement disclosures by providing new evidence about the effect of limiting managerial discretion (FAF, 2012). Although prior studies suggest more restrictive standards reduce the usefulness of accounting information (Cheng et al, 2022) and make accruals less predictive of future cash flows (Folsom et al, 2017), we find that UTBs accrued under FIN 48 are reliably predictive of future income tax cash outflows despite the financial reporting restrictions that it imposed on managers. Thus, future reforms to constrain managerial discretion could prove fruitful to the extent that bright‐line rules do not induce systematic bias in accounting accruals.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we contribute broadly to research examining the effects of accounting standards on financial statement disclosures by providing new evidence about the effect of limiting managerial discretion (FAF, 2012). Although prior studies suggest more restrictive standards reduce the usefulness of accounting information (Cheng et al, 2022) and make accruals less predictive of future cash flows (Folsom et al, 2017), we find that UTBs accrued under FIN 48 are reliably predictive of future income tax cash outflows despite the financial reporting restrictions that it imposed on managers. Thus, future reforms to constrain managerial discretion could prove fruitful to the extent that bright‐line rules do not induce systematic bias in accounting accruals.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Regulators and academics frequently debate the costs and benefits of managerial discretion within accounting standards as they relate to financial statement users (Bauguess, 2016; Cheng et al, 2022; Lewis, 2012). This debate is especially salient for contingent liabilities, which represent uncertain claims on firms' future cash flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, because of the simultaneous choice of several loan terms in a single contract (e.g., Coyne & Stice (2018), Cheng et al. (2022)), we control for other contracting choices that are available to lenders, including loan maturity (Loan Maturity), the presence of collaterals (Collateral), the number of financial covenants (Num_Fin_Cov), the number of general covenants (Num_Gen_Cov) and the size of loans (Loan Size).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, recent studies demonstrate the importance of examining both pricing and nonpricing terms of loan contracts (e.g., Armstrong et al (2018), Beatty et al (2002), Beatty et al (2019), Bharath et al (2008), Campello & Gao (2017), Cheng et al (2022), Graham et al (2008), Qiu & Shen (2017)). For example, Hsieh et al (2019) and Robin et al (2022) contribute to the literature that examines both pricing and nonpricing terms of loan contracts from the perspectives of management forecasts and board corruption, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation