Does rhythmic auditory stimulation compared to no rhythmic auditory stimulation improve patient’s static and dynamic standing balance post stroke?

Pfeiffer, Kathryn; Clements, Jacob; Smith, McKayla; Gregoire, Matthew; Conti, Chris

doi:10.1080/10833196.2019.1666220

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Facilitating walking rehabilitation is a major use of RAS [7,32]. RAS demonstrated significant effects on improving muscle coordination and balance performance to patients with PD and stroke [53,54]. Early researchers focused more on the patterns of auditory cues [4,6].…”

Section: Motor Dysfunctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to create an all-around insight into the evolutions, status, and global trends of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) research via enhanced bibliometric methods for the 2001–2020 time period. Articles concerning RAS were extracted from the Web of Science database. CiteSpace, Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and Graphpad Prism were employed to analyze publication patterns and research trends. A total of 586 publications related to RAS between 2001 and 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science database. The researcher Goswami U. made the greatest contribution to this field. The University of Toronto was the institution that published the most articles. Motor dysfunction, sensory perception, and cognition are the three major domains of RAS research. Neural tracking, working memory, and neural basis may be the latest research frontiers. This study reveals the publication patterns and topic trends of RAS based on the records published between 2001 and 2020. The insights obtained provided useful references for the future research and applications of RAS.

show abstract

Section: Motor Dysfunctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Over the last twenty years, researches have found that people with neurological disorders such as stroke could improve motor control, movement and re-programme the execution of movement patterns with musical rhythm entrainment. [6] Systematic reviews have shown that rhythmic auditory stimulation interventions have bene cial effects on gait velocity, stride length, cadence, and postural stability [6, [9][10][11][12]. Janzen et al (2022) suggest that patients' clinical stage, cognitive capacity and motor function at enrolment should be considered for a feasible and effective intervention in stroke [6].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Is rhythmic auditory stimulation the most effective therapy for functional ambulation after stroke? A systematic review

Gonzalez-Hoelling

Reig‐Garcia

Bertrán-Noguer

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Several studies have reported the effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) on functional ambulation in stroke patients, yet a systematic overview is currently lacking. This study aims to summarize and evaluate the available evidence about the efficacy of RAS for functional ambulation, consider the use of walking assistive devices during the assessment or the intervention in stroke patients, and to find out if the effect of RAS and music-based RAS differs depending on the stroke brain site and affected area. Methods The Pubmed, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL electronic databases were searched for reports evaluating the effect of RAS on walking in stroke patients. Results Nineteen articles were included (916 stroke survivors). Most studies were of good methodological quality according to the PEDro scale, but they had a high risk of bias. The most consistent finding was that RAS improves walking and balance parameters in stroke patients in all phases compared to baseline and versus control groups with conventional treatment. Functional ambulation and the use of walking assistive devices were inconsistently reported. Several studies also suggest that RAS may are as good as other complementary therapies (horse-riding and visual cueing). Conclusions Despite the beneficial effects of RAS, the question remains as to whether it is better than other complementary therapies. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, the interventions in control groups, the varied durations, and the different outcome measures, we suggest that care should be taken in interpreting and generalizing findings. PROSPERO registration number : CRD42021277940

show abstract

The effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on functional ambulation after stroke: a systematic review

Gonzalez-Hoelling,

Reig-García,

Bertran-Noguer

et al. 2024

BMC Complement Med Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Several studies have reported the effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) on functional ambulation in stroke patients, yet no systematic overview has yet been published. This study aims to synthesize the available evidence describing changes in stroke patients after RAS intervention for functional ambulation and the use of walking assistive devices, and to find out if the effect of RAS and music-based RAS differs depending on the lesioned area. Methods The PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL electronic databases were searched for reports evaluating the effect of RAS on walking in stroke patients, applying the PICOS criteria for the inclusion of studies. Results Twenty one articles were included (948 stroke survivors). Most studies were of good methodological quality according to the PEDro scale, but they had a high risk of bias. The most consistent finding was that RAS improves walking and balance parameters in stroke patients in all phases compared to baseline and versus control groups with conventional treatment. Functional ambulation and the use of walking assistive devices were inconsistently reported. Several studies also suggest that RAS may be as good as other complementary therapies (horse-riding and visual cueing). Conclusions Despite the beneficial effects of RAS, the question remains as to whether it is better than other complementary therapies. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, the interventions in control groups, the varied durations, and the different outcome measures, we suggest that care should be taken in interpreting and generalizing findings. PROSPERO Registration CRD42021277940.

show abstract

Does rhythmic auditory stimulation compared to no rhythmic auditory stimulation improve patient’s static and dynamic standing balance post stroke?

Cited by 3 publications

References 9 publications

Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation

Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation

Is rhythmic auditory stimulation the most effective therapy for functional ambulation after stroke? A systematic review

The effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on functional ambulation after stroke: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About