2020
DOI: 10.1177/2051415819895399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does routine histology alter management post circumcision?

Abstract: Objective: Circumcision is a commonly performed urological procedure, histology is often requested with unexpected malignancy cited as the reason. This paper aims to determine if routine histology following circumcision alters the clinical management of patients. Patients and methods: The clinical records of 508 consecutive adult patients circumcised at a district general hospital between 1/1/12 and 31/12/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common practice (at least in large parts of the UK) for circumcision samples not to be processed histologically in their entirety. 16,17 Instead, only random or 'representative' samples of the prepuce are examined. This raises problems due to the focal nature of MGLSc and areas of incipient or burnt-out disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is common practice (at least in large parts of the UK) for circumcision samples not to be processed histologically in their entirety. 16,17 Instead, only random or 'representative' samples of the prepuce are examined. This raises problems due to the focal nature of MGLSc and areas of incipient or burnt-out disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is not uncommon for clinically confirmed MGLSc to be missed histologically even in circumcision samples. It is common practice (at least in large parts of the UK) for circumcision samples not to be processed histologically in their entirety 16,17 . Instead, only random or ‘representative’ samples of the prepuce are examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, Kerr et al. [ 11 ] report that clinical diagnosis of lesions in the prepuce correspond to histological diagnosis in up to 80% of cases. Coupled with the lack of evidence associating dermatological lesions of the foreskin with the development of Squamous Cell Carcinoma, these authors are of the opinion that routine histology testing is not required and that clinicians can reliably achieve a diagnosis solely with a physical examination of the area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We write to express our reservations about the article ‘Does routine histology alter management post-circumcision?’ by Kerr et al 1 , recently published in the Journal of Clinical Urology . The stated aims were ‘to confirm that routine histology for circumcision is not required and that clinical diagnosis is largely accurate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%